163.75 VS. 169.09 performance (Crysis Time Demo)

Compare. seems nothing changed.

Result:almost a 10%boost..Worth to install! ![]()
(of course in other game the 169.09 wont boost alot coz it is optimized only for Crysis)

Compare. seems nothing changed.

Result:almost a 10%boost..Worth to install! ![]()
(of course in other game the 169.09 wont boost alot coz it is optimized only for Crysis)
November 14th, 2007 at 5:17 pm
seems more blurred in the 169.09 than the toehr.
that said I hate edge aliasing.
November 14th, 2007 at 5:21 pm
oh thats the Depth field effects.
will upload another clear pic..
November 15th, 2007 at 11:28 pm
Looks pretty close… I would like to see what driver optimizations do for this game performance wise… BioShock performance went up %20 from 162.18 to 163.67(and .69, .75, and .76)… The 169.09 are only betas anyway… and for that much: benching drivers. There is no way that they would WHQL these anyway…
March 21st, 2008 at 7:46 pm
What is making these GPU drivers so hard to make? It is because of ms?