<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [review]Intel 45nm wolfdale processor Core 2 Duo E8400</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:32:48 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pegasus-12</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-7013</link>
		<dc:creator>Pegasus-12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-7013</guid>
		<description>In response to #55 &quot;Chris&quot;, yes the E8400 is 64-bit. 32-bit processors and Operating systems are limited in the amount of RAM they can recognize and use. I currently have 8gb of DDR2 (dual-channel, ganged mode) and use Windows XP x64 in order to fully benefit from the additional memory. The major drawback to using a 64-bit Operating system is the lack of drivers and support from hardware manufacturers, but this situation has improved greatly in recent years. Another benefit comes from the increased speed/efficiency of data processing, in that 64-bit systems process data in 64-bit blocks rather than the 32-bit blocks in older systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to #55 &#8220;Chris&#8221;, yes the E8400 is 64-bit. 32-bit processors and Operating systems are limited in the amount of RAM they can recognize and use. I currently have 8gb of DDR2 (dual-channel, ganged mode) and use Windows XP x64 in order to fully benefit from the additional memory. The major drawback to using a 64-bit Operating system is the lack of drivers and support from hardware manufacturers, but this situation has improved greatly in recent years. Another benefit comes from the increased speed/efficiency of data processing, in that 64-bit systems process data in 64-bit blocks rather than the 32-bit blocks in older systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-5549</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-5549</guid>
		<description>So what is better??? E6850 or E8400???? I see people have said the E8400 uses less energy and has 2 more mb of cache so why is the E6850 having some better results on the testing???? Also I see someone mentioned something about the E8400 being 64bit and the E6850 being 32bit. This doesnt have anything to do with how much ram you can use does it??? Cause I know windows xp supports only 3 gigs and vista (64bit) supports more.. Someone, anyone!?!? My aim screen name is &quot;Ftptcp&quot; and email is chris@painkill.net . Let me know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is better??? E6850 or E8400???? I see people have said the E8400 uses less energy and has 2 more mb of cache so why is the E6850 having some better results on the testing???? Also I see someone mentioned something about the E8400 being 64bit and the E6850 being 32bit. This doesnt have anything to do with how much ram you can use does it??? Cause I know windows xp supports only 3 gigs and vista (64bit) supports more.. Someone, anyone!?!? My aim screen name is &#8220;Ftptcp&#8221; and email is <a href="mailto:chris@painkill.net">chris@painkill.net</a> . Let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edgar</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-5310</link>
		<dc:creator>edgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-5310</guid>
		<description>really i have proven that e8400 is coool and quiet you can hardly hear its sound as if your rig is turned off, especially if you use 12mm cooling fan..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really i have proven that e8400 is coool and quiet you can hardly hear its sound as if your rig is turned off, especially if you use 12mm cooling fan..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgios</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4868</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4868</guid>
		<description>Thanx Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4852</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4852</guid>
		<description>of course go for 800MHz lar, memory is cheap these days.. and P5N-EM/HDMI supports up to 800MHz if you are not a overclocker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course go for 800MHz lar, memory is cheap these days.. and P5N-EM/HDMI supports up to 800MHz if you are not a overclocker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgios</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4851</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4851</guid>
		<description>Hi there.
I am intrested in buying one in the following days.
I have chosen for motherboard the ASUS P5N-EM/HDMI.
My question is about RAM.
Will I need a 800 Mhz or a 677 DDR2 mem?
I dont want to overclock or anything I just need the system to run at it&#039;s &quot;standard&quot; speed.
I know this question sounds kinda stupid but with all these standards I am confused :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there.<br />
I am intrested in buying one in the following days.<br />
I have chosen for motherboard the ASUS P5N-EM/HDMI.<br />
My question is about RAM.<br />
Will I need a 800 Mhz or a 677 DDR2 mem?<br />
I dont want to overclock or anything I just need the system to run at it&#8217;s &#8220;standard&#8221; speed.<br />
I know this question sounds kinda stupid but with all these standards I am confused <img src='http://en.expreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chillios</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4831</link>
		<dc:creator>chillios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4831</guid>
		<description>i just bouht it looks cool hope thats its gonne  work that cool aswell E8400 it was at a very low price ==165,04 euro

thanx for the comments make me feel more relaxed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just bouht it looks cool hope thats its gonne  work that cool aswell E8400 it was at a very low price ==165,04 euro</p>
<p>thanx for the comments make me feel more relaxed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hardware</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4599</link>
		<dc:creator>Hardware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4599</guid>
		<description>The good thing about the E8400 is that it’s significantly lower power - the fact that it performs like an E6850 for the price of an E6750 is just a bonus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good thing about the E8400 is that it’s significantly lower power &#8211; the fact that it performs like an E6850 for the price of an E6750 is just a bonus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aoweng</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4520</link>
		<dc:creator>aoweng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4520</guid>
		<description>can any body try encoding with dvd shrink or vista dvd encoder maker
all this numbers does not mean any thing till u actually use a program and what about programs that only uses one core
i got an old p4 3.6 ht i wanna upgrade and i wanna know if it is gonna benefit me specially with encoding videos to diff formats plus what about pc games</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can any body try encoding with dvd shrink or vista dvd encoder maker<br />
all this numbers does not mean any thing till u actually use a program and what about programs that only uses one core<br />
i got an old p4 3.6 ht i wanna upgrade and i wanna know if it is gonna benefit me specially with encoding videos to diff formats plus what about pc games</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tshepo</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4334</link>
		<dc:creator>tshepo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4334</guid>
		<description>i am impressed with my core 2 dou machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am impressed with my core 2 dou machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4315</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4315</guid>
		<description>i just bought one of these and im hoping its going to be good. at least better than my current 3.0GHz celeron d :s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just bought one of these and im hoping its going to be good. at least better than my current 3.0GHz celeron d :s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Sweden</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-3958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Sweden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-3958</guid>
		<description>Why did you do this test on a 32bit os?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you do this test on a 32bit os?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: processor e8400</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-3710</link>
		<dc:creator>processor e8400</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-3710</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New PC Component Advice - Project Reality Forums</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-3068</link>
		<dc:creator>New PC Component Advice - Project Reality Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-3068</guid>
		<description>[...] E8500: The Best Just Got Better AnandTech: The Penryn Preview - Part I: Wolfdale Performance [review]Intel 45nm wolfdale processor Core 2 Duo E8400 - Expreview.com This should help you decide to wait or not Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550/Q9450 - 45nm Prevails - Tactical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] E8500: The Best Just Got Better AnandTech: The Penryn Preview &#8211; Part I: Wolfdale Performance [review]Intel 45nm wolfdale processor Core 2 Duo E8400 &#8211; Expreview.com This should help you decide to wait or not Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550/Q9450 &#8211; 45nm Prevails &#8211; Tactical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-2532</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-2532</guid>
		<description>I have got one and the speed i experienced was amazing ,the frame rates in games and overclock up to 3.86 stable on abit ip35-e</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have got one and the speed i experienced was amazing ,the frame rates in games and overclock up to 3.86 stable on abit ip35-e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-2037</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-2037</guid>
		<description>I am running the E8400, found at Microcenter for $189.00, Newegg is still selling the E6850 for $274.99. E8400 is sweet with my ASUS PK5. This review was very helpful.
Thanks
Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am running the E8400, found at Microcenter for $189.00, Newegg is still selling the E6850 for $274.99. E8400 is sweet with my ASUS PK5. This review was very helpful.<br />
Thanks<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-1#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>#  nate Says:
February 10th, 2008 at 5:22 pm

just remember, your ram would be running at 800 mhz doing these tests and the e8400 is 1333/1066fsb also the e8400 is 64 bit not 32 like the e6850 its still a good review though.

SO do you mean we can realistically use 4GB of ram on this processor and it accepts the whole thing, or is it still limited to 2GB when using a 32bit windows?  sorry im not literate with the 32/64bit differences between CPU and OS&#039;s.

Anyone got any input? thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#  nate Says:<br />
February 10th, 2008 at 5:22 pm</p>
<p>just remember, your ram would be running at 800 mhz doing these tests and the e8400 is 1333/1066fsb also the e8400 is 64 bit not 32 like the e6850 its still a good review though.</p>
<p>SO do you mean we can realistically use 4GB of ram on this processor and it accepts the whole thing, or is it still limited to 2GB when using a 32bit windows?  sorry im not literate with the 32/64bit differences between CPU and OS&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Anyone got any input? thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-1#comment-1926</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-1926</guid>
		<description>my bad you didnt have fsb at 800 mhz but the potential down the line is even better for the e8400 when 1333ddr2 is ready</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my bad you didnt have fsb at 800 mhz but the potential down the line is even better for the e8400 when 1333ddr2 is ready</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->