<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [review]Intel 45nm wolfdale processor Core 2 Duo E8400</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: killer loop sunglasses</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-27976</link>
		<dc:creator>killer loop sunglasses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-27976</guid>
		<description>Interesting   read ,  I&#039;m going to spend more time  learning about this subject</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting   read ,  I&#8217;m going to spend more time  learning about this subject</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurtis Minniti</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-18084</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurtis Minniti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-18084</guid>
		<description>Lol,I adore Mr.Jackson! He was the best to ever do it! We will never ever have someone like  MJ! Rest in Peace to the GREATEST!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol,I adore Mr.Jackson! He was the best to ever do it! We will never ever have someone like  MJ! Rest in Peace to the GREATEST!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pegasus-12</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-7013</link>
		<dc:creator>Pegasus-12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-7013</guid>
		<description>In response to #55 &quot;Chris&quot;, yes the E8400 is 64-bit. 32-bit processors and Operating systems are limited in the amount of RAM they can recognize and use. I currently have 8gb of DDR2 (dual-channel, ganged mode) and use Windows XP x64 in order to fully benefit from the additional memory. The major drawback to using a 64-bit Operating system is the lack of drivers and support from hardware manufacturers, but this situation has improved greatly in recent years. Another benefit comes from the increased speed/efficiency of data processing, in that 64-bit systems process data in 64-bit blocks rather than the 32-bit blocks in older systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to #55 &#8220;Chris&#8221;, yes the E8400 is 64-bit. 32-bit processors and Operating systems are limited in the amount of RAM they can recognize and use. I currently have 8gb of DDR2 (dual-channel, ganged mode) and use Windows XP x64 in order to fully benefit from the additional memory. The major drawback to using a 64-bit Operating system is the lack of drivers and support from hardware manufacturers, but this situation has improved greatly in recent years. Another benefit comes from the increased speed/efficiency of data processing, in that 64-bit systems process data in 64-bit blocks rather than the 32-bit blocks in older systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-5549</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-5549</guid>
		<description>So what is better??? E6850 or E8400???? I see people have said the E8400 uses less energy and has 2 more mb of cache so why is the E6850 having some better results on the testing???? Also I see someone mentioned something about the E8400 being 64bit and the E6850 being 32bit. This doesnt have anything to do with how much ram you can use does it??? Cause I know windows xp supports only 3 gigs and vista (64bit) supports more.. Someone, anyone!?!? My aim screen name is &quot;Ftptcp&quot; and email is chris@painkill.net . Let me know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is better??? E6850 or E8400???? I see people have said the E8400 uses less energy and has 2 more mb of cache so why is the E6850 having some better results on the testing???? Also I see someone mentioned something about the E8400 being 64bit and the E6850 being 32bit. This doesnt have anything to do with how much ram you can use does it??? Cause I know windows xp supports only 3 gigs and vista (64bit) supports more.. Someone, anyone!?!? My aim screen name is &#8220;Ftptcp&#8221; and email is <a href="mailto:chris@painkill.net">chris@painkill.net</a> . Let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edgar</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-5310</link>
		<dc:creator>edgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-5310</guid>
		<description>really i have proven that e8400 is coool and quiet you can hardly hear its sound as if your rig is turned off, especially if you use 12mm cooling fan..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really i have proven that e8400 is coool and quiet you can hardly hear its sound as if your rig is turned off, especially if you use 12mm cooling fan..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgios</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4868</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4868</guid>
		<description>Thanx Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4852</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4852</guid>
		<description>of course go for 800MHz lar, memory is cheap these days.. and P5N-EM/HDMI supports up to 800MHz if you are not a overclocker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course go for 800MHz lar, memory is cheap these days.. and P5N-EM/HDMI supports up to 800MHz if you are not a overclocker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgios</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4851</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4851</guid>
		<description>Hi there.
I am intrested in buying one in the following days.
I have chosen for motherboard the ASUS P5N-EM/HDMI.
My question is about RAM.
Will I need a 800 Mhz or a 677 DDR2 mem?
I dont want to overclock or anything I just need the system to run at it&#039;s &quot;standard&quot; speed.
I know this question sounds kinda stupid but with all these standards I am confused :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there.<br />
I am intrested in buying one in the following days.<br />
I have chosen for motherboard the ASUS P5N-EM/HDMI.<br />
My question is about RAM.<br />
Will I need a 800 Mhz or a 677 DDR2 mem?<br />
I dont want to overclock or anything I just need the system to run at it&#8217;s &#8220;standard&#8221; speed.<br />
I know this question sounds kinda stupid but with all these standards I am confused <img src='http://en.expreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chillios</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4831</link>
		<dc:creator>chillios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4831</guid>
		<description>i just bouht it looks cool hope thats its gonne  work that cool aswell E8400 it was at a very low price ==165,04 euro

thanx for the comments make me feel more relaxed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just bouht it looks cool hope thats its gonne  work that cool aswell E8400 it was at a very low price ==165,04 euro</p>
<p>thanx for the comments make me feel more relaxed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hardware</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4599</link>
		<dc:creator>Hardware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4599</guid>
		<description>The good thing about the E8400 is that it’s significantly lower power - the fact that it performs like an E6850 for the price of an E6750 is just a bonus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good thing about the E8400 is that it’s significantly lower power &#8211; the fact that it performs like an E6850 for the price of an E6750 is just a bonus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aoweng</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4520</link>
		<dc:creator>aoweng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4520</guid>
		<description>can any body try encoding with dvd shrink or vista dvd encoder maker
all this numbers does not mean any thing till u actually use a program and what about programs that only uses one core
i got an old p4 3.6 ht i wanna upgrade and i wanna know if it is gonna benefit me specially with encoding videos to diff formats plus what about pc games</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can any body try encoding with dvd shrink or vista dvd encoder maker<br />
all this numbers does not mean any thing till u actually use a program and what about programs that only uses one core<br />
i got an old p4 3.6 ht i wanna upgrade and i wanna know if it is gonna benefit me specially with encoding videos to diff formats plus what about pc games</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tshepo</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4334</link>
		<dc:creator>tshepo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4334</guid>
		<description>i am impressed with my core 2 dou machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am impressed with my core 2 dou machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-4315</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-4315</guid>
		<description>i just bought one of these and im hoping its going to be good. at least better than my current 3.0GHz celeron d :s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just bought one of these and im hoping its going to be good. at least better than my current 3.0GHz celeron d :s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Sweden</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-3958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Sweden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-3958</guid>
		<description>Why did you do this test on a 32bit os?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you do this test on a 32bit os?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: processor e8400</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-3710</link>
		<dc:creator>processor e8400</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-3710</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New PC Component Advice - Project Reality Forums</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-3068</link>
		<dc:creator>New PC Component Advice - Project Reality Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-3068</guid>
		<description>[...] E8500: The Best Just Got Better AnandTech: The Penryn Preview - Part I: Wolfdale Performance [review]Intel 45nm wolfdale processor Core 2 Duo E8400 - Expreview.com This should help you decide to wait or not Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550/Q9450 - 45nm Prevails - Tactical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] E8500: The Best Just Got Better AnandTech: The Penryn Preview &#8211; Part I: Wolfdale Performance [review]Intel 45nm wolfdale processor Core 2 Duo E8400 &#8211; Expreview.com This should help you decide to wait or not Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550/Q9450 &#8211; 45nm Prevails &#8211; Tactical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-2532</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-2532</guid>
		<description>I have got one and the speed i experienced was amazing ,the frame rates in games and overclock up to 3.86 stable on abit ip35-e</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have got one and the speed i experienced was amazing ,the frame rates in games and overclock up to 3.86 stable on abit ip35-e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/30/reviewintel-45nm-wolfdale-processor-core-2-duo-e8400/68.html/comment-page-2#comment-2037</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=68#comment-2037</guid>
		<description>I am running the E8400, found at Microcenter for $189.00, Newegg is still selling the E6850 for $274.99. E8400 is sweet with my ASUS PK5. This review was very helpful.
Thanks
Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am running the E8400, found at Microcenter for $189.00, Newegg is still selling the E6850 for $274.99. E8400 is sweet with my ASUS PK5. This review was very helpful.<br />
Thanks<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
