<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No more cold bugs in QX9650</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/08/no-more-cold-bugs-in-qx9650/92.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/08/no-more-cold-bugs-in-qx9650/92.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:10:37 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: quad extreme vs q6600 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/08/no-more-cold-bugs-in-qx9650/92.html/comment-page-1#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>quad extreme vs q6600 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 05:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=92#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>[...] A 6GHZ QX9650!!   Yeah, the 9650 overclock better... look at the review    __________________ My own music  ---- Is your IDE HDD slow?  FIX IT HERE    *I+K*   *Ivan+Keysi* [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A 6GHZ QX9650!!   Yeah, the 9650 overclock better&#8230; look at the review    __________________ My own music  &#8212;- Is your IDE HDD slow?  FIX IT HERE    *I+K*   *Ivan+Keysi* [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->