<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GeForce 9800 GX2 coming on Feb, 19th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: unmetered linux vps</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-28184</link>
		<dc:creator>unmetered linux vps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-28184</guid>
		<description>It’s onerous to seek out knowledgeable people on this subject, but you sound like you recognize what you’re speaking about! Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s onerous to seek out knowledgeable people on this subject, but you sound like you recognize what you’re speaking about! Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerold Izzard</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-26941</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerold Izzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-26941</guid>
		<description>Superb content, my friend. You are truly a literary genius. This kind of article requires a great mind and a lot of research. I commend you on the hard work you put into this writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superb content, my friend. You are truly a literary genius. This kind of article requires a great mind and a lot of research. I commend you on the hard work you put into this writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asa Muczynski</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-23371</link>
		<dc:creator>Asa Muczynski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-23371</guid>
		<description>One thing that I have noticed is that there are a whole lot of earthquakes these days. Big ones too. So what does that have to do with anything? Making money is not all that easy these days but fortunately, I found a trick. This technology was secretly &quot;copied&quot; from one of the top internet enterprises. There is nothing illegal or shady about it... it&#039;s just kind of secret. The software needs very little babysitting so it&#039;s basically set it up and forget it. Some people are tempted to exploit this software and use it for unethical web promotion but the owner is asking that everyone who is lucky enough to get it, please try to respect the laws of the internet. If you can spend no more than 3 minutes to download and setup this software, and then click the &#039;Start Button&#039; just once to start this autopilot push button software... Then you can make money online. This never seen before push button software proved that the best and most profitable traffic on the internet is free traffic. You might be tempted to try to disect this software in order to &#039;see the magic&#039; but why bother? It&#039;s a pretty amazing piece of software and it just simply... works. Get it before it is gone -&gt; http://cash411.info/go/218</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that I have noticed is that there are a whole lot of earthquakes these days. Big ones too. So what does that have to do with anything? Making money is not all that easy these days but fortunately, I found a trick. This technology was secretly &#8220;copied&#8221; from one of the top internet enterprises. There is nothing illegal or shady about it&#8230; it&#8217;s just kind of secret. The software needs very little babysitting so it&#8217;s basically set it up and forget it. Some people are tempted to exploit this software and use it for unethical web promotion but the owner is asking that everyone who is lucky enough to get it, please try to respect the laws of the internet. If you can spend no more than 3 minutes to download and setup this software, and then click the &#8216;Start Button&#8217; just once to start this autopilot push button software&#8230; Then you can make money online. This never seen before push button software proved that the best and most profitable traffic on the internet is free traffic. You might be tempted to try to disect this software in order to &#8216;see the magic&#8217; but why bother? It&#8217;s a pretty amazing piece of software and it just simply&#8230; works. Get it before it is gone -&gt; <a href="http://cash411.info/go/218" rel="nofollow">http://cash411.info/go/218</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Building</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-19822</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-19822</guid>
		<description>great... this is what i lookin for :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great&#8230; this is what i lookin for <img src='http://en.expreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InAUGral</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-2625</link>
		<dc:creator>InAUGral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 01:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-2625</guid>
		<description>lol, they fooled you with the predecessors picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, they fooled you with the predecessors picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-2095</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-2095</guid>
		<description>Because NVIDIA delay almost all their new product,
please read the latest post: http://en.expreview.com/?p=233</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because NVIDIA delay almost all their new product,<br />
please read the latest post: <a href="http://en.expreview.com/?p=233" rel="nofollow">http://en.expreview.com/?p=233</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-2090</guid>
		<description>hmm... february 23rd, 2008...no 9800 GX2?

i see 9600 GT&#039;s tho...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm&#8230; february 23rd, 2008&#8230;no 9800 GX2?</p>
<p>i see 9600 GT&#8217;s tho&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gotmuff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1955</link>
		<dc:creator>gotmuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1955</guid>
		<description>@ Kam,

You idiot. Go back to school and improve your English skills before lecturing others on their poor spelling. The correct spelling is GRAMMAR, if you do not believe me, check www.dictionary.com, Microsoft Word &#039;07 spell checker, or Firefox&#039;s inbuilt checker.

On a more relevant note, the Geforce 9800 X2 (or whatever it will be called) seems likely to out-perform AMD&#039;s new 3870 X2 (yes I said AMD, seeing as the ATI brand is now owned by them). I base this statement on the following quote from tomshardware.com:
[...] there are a number of cases where the 3870 X2 will be outperformed by a single 8800 Ultra or even an 8800 GTX [...]
http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/02/04/best_cards_february_2008/

Given that the 3870 X2 can sometimes be outperformed by &#039;almost&#039; last gen nvidia cards (considering the soon to be released 9 series), even if only let down by driver weaknesses, we can expect the 9800 X2 to be better than the 8800s and hence better than the 3870 X2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Kam,</p>
<p>You idiot. Go back to school and improve your English skills before lecturing others on their poor spelling. The correct spelling is GRAMMAR, if you do not believe me, check <a href="http://www.dictionary.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dictionary.com</a>, Microsoft Word &#8217;07 spell checker, or Firefox&#8217;s inbuilt checker.</p>
<p>On a more relevant note, the Geforce 9800 X2 (or whatever it will be called) seems likely to out-perform AMD&#8217;s new 3870 X2 (yes I said AMD, seeing as the ATI brand is now owned by them). I base this statement on the following quote from tomshardware.com:<br />
[...] there are a number of cases where the 3870 X2 will be outperformed by a single 8800 Ultra or even an 8800 GTX [...]<br />
<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/02/04/best_cards_february_2008/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/02/04/best_cards_february_2008/</a></p>
<p>Given that the 3870 X2 can sometimes be outperformed by &#8216;almost&#8217; last gen nvidia cards (considering the soon to be released 9 series), even if only let down by driver weaknesses, we can expect the 9800 X2 to be better than the 8800s and hence better than the 3870 X2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quad-SLI: Technical prowess, but ineffiecent? - FileFront Gaming Forums</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1722</link>
		<dc:creator>Quad-SLI: Technical prowess, but ineffiecent? - FileFront Gaming Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1722</guid>
		<description>[...] this 9800 X2 is Quad-SLI. Is it just me, or is Quad-SLI extreme overkill as well as inefficient?   Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this 9800 X2 is Quad-SLI. Is it just me, or is Quad-SLI extreme overkill as well as inefficient?   Expreview.com &#8211; Extra Hardware News Report!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moschos K. Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GeForce 9800 GX2 ~ 19 Φεβρουαρίου 2008</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1445</link>
		<dc:creator>Moschos K. Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GeForce 9800 GX2 ~ 19 Φεβρουαρίου 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1445</guid>
		<description>[...] &#949;&#948;&#969; [ VIA outofspecs.gr [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &epsilon;&delta;&omega; [ VIA outofspecs.gr [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kam</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Kam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>Dear Coma,

The correct grammer for your first line of enquiry to Shinobuchan is &quot;how does bad grammer reduce your credibility?&quot;.

Anyhow, it is pretty specific in some points such as power connector details and some such, however, it is very little of importance to most gamers/end users...
We would appreciate if we got more info on benches and porojected release date... speculation on prices etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Coma,</p>
<p>The correct grammer for your first line of enquiry to Shinobuchan is &#8220;how does bad grammer reduce your credibility?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyhow, it is pretty specific in some points such as power connector details and some such, however, it is very little of importance to most gamers/end users&#8230;<br />
We would appreciate if we got more info on benches and porojected release date&#8230; speculation on prices etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1352</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1352</guid>
		<description>shinobuchan, this is a chinese website... don&#039;t expect their grammar to be top notch

however, their information seems pretty reliable so far</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shinobuchan, this is a chinese website&#8230; don&#8217;t expect their grammar to be top notch</p>
<p>however, their information seems pretty reliable so far</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 01:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>@Max, 
ya, we don&#039;t get it either. NVIDIA is using a weird naming scheme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Max,<br />
ya, we don&#8217;t get it either. NVIDIA is using a weird naming scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>Я не понял, а где обещаная 9800 Ultra ??? Хачу ультру....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Я не понял, а где обещаная 9800 Ultra ??? Хачу ультру&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-998</guid>
		<description>@ Shinobuchan,

personally i think you should put your comment to those &quot;GeForce 9800 GTX (G100) Specs revealed&quot; thread. In those thread you can only read speculation but infos here are all from reliable sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Shinobuchan,</p>
<p>personally i think you should put your comment to those &#8220;GeForce 9800 GTX (G100) Specs revealed&#8221; thread. In those thread you can only read speculation but infos here are all from reliable sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coma</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>Coma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-993</guid>
		<description>Shinobuchan, why does bad grammar reduce from your credibility?
If anything, it *adds* to it. Do you not think a person who&#039;s making something up would bother making it look realistic?

Anyway, expreview have proven to be credible with their accurate before-everybody-else G92 review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shinobuchan, why does bad grammar reduce from your credibility?<br />
If anything, it *adds* to it. Do you not think a person who&#8217;s making something up would bother making it look realistic?</p>
<p>Anyway, expreview have proven to be credible with their accurate before-everybody-else G92 review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geforce 9800 GX2 i februari at Pecekoll.se</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>Geforce 9800 GX2 i februari at Pecekoll.se</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 07:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-948</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Expreview. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Expreview. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shinobuchan</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Shinobuchan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-943</guid>
		<description>This is bullshit. Look at that wierd grammar and spelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is bullshit. Look at that wierd grammar and spelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
