<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GeForce 9800 GX2 coming on Feb, 19th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:15:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: InAUGral</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-2625</link>
		<dc:creator>InAUGral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 01:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-2625</guid>
		<description>lol, they fooled you with the predecessors picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, they fooled you with the predecessors picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-2095</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-2095</guid>
		<description>Because NVIDIA delay almost all their new product,
please read the latest post: http://en.expreview.com/?p=233</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because NVIDIA delay almost all their new product,<br />
please read the latest post: <a href="http://en.expreview.com/?p=233" rel="nofollow">http://en.expreview.com/?p=233</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-2090</guid>
		<description>hmm... february 23rd, 2008...no 9800 GX2?

i see 9600 GT&#039;s tho...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm&#8230; february 23rd, 2008&#8230;no 9800 GX2?</p>
<p>i see 9600 GT&#8217;s tho&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gotmuff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1955</link>
		<dc:creator>gotmuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1955</guid>
		<description>@ Kam,

You idiot. Go back to school and improve your English skills before lecturing others on their poor spelling. The correct spelling is GRAMMAR, if you do not believe me, check www.dictionary.com, Microsoft Word &#039;07 spell checker, or Firefox&#039;s inbuilt checker.

On a more relevant note, the Geforce 9800 X2 (or whatever it will be called) seems likely to out-perform AMD&#039;s new 3870 X2 (yes I said AMD, seeing as the ATI brand is now owned by them). I base this statement on the following quote from tomshardware.com:
[...] there are a number of cases where the 3870 X2 will be outperformed by a single 8800 Ultra or even an 8800 GTX [...]
http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/02/04/best_cards_february_2008/

Given that the 3870 X2 can sometimes be outperformed by &#039;almost&#039; last gen nvidia cards (considering the soon to be released 9 series), even if only let down by driver weaknesses, we can expect the 9800 X2 to be better than the 8800s and hence better than the 3870 X2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Kam,</p>
<p>You idiot. Go back to school and improve your English skills before lecturing others on their poor spelling. The correct spelling is GRAMMAR, if you do not believe me, check <a href="http://www.dictionary.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dictionary.com</a>, Microsoft Word &#8216;07 spell checker, or Firefox&#8217;s inbuilt checker.</p>
<p>On a more relevant note, the Geforce 9800 X2 (or whatever it will be called) seems likely to out-perform AMD&#8217;s new 3870 X2 (yes I said AMD, seeing as the ATI brand is now owned by them). I base this statement on the following quote from tomshardware.com:<br />
[...] there are a number of cases where the 3870 X2 will be outperformed by a single 8800 Ultra or even an 8800 GTX [...]<br />
<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/02/04/best_cards_february_2008/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/02/04/best_cards_february_2008/</a></p>
<p>Given that the 3870 X2 can sometimes be outperformed by &#8216;almost&#8217; last gen nvidia cards (considering the soon to be released 9 series), even if only let down by driver weaknesses, we can expect the 9800 X2 to be better than the 8800s and hence better than the 3870 X2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quad-SLI: Technical prowess, but ineffiecent? - FileFront Gaming Forums</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1722</link>
		<dc:creator>Quad-SLI: Technical prowess, but ineffiecent? - FileFront Gaming Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1722</guid>
		<description>[...] this 9800 X2 is Quad-SLI. Is it just me, or is Quad-SLI extreme overkill as well as inefficient?   Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this 9800 X2 is Quad-SLI. Is it just me, or is Quad-SLI extreme overkill as well as inefficient?   Expreview.com &#8211; Extra Hardware News Report!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moschos K. Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GeForce 9800 GX2 ~ 19 Φεβρουαρίου 2008</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1445</link>
		<dc:creator>Moschos K. Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GeForce 9800 GX2 ~ 19 Φεβρουαρίου 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1445</guid>
		<description>[...] &#949;&#948;&#969; [ VIA outofspecs.gr [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &epsilon;&delta;&omega; [ VIA outofspecs.gr [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kam</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Kam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>Dear Coma,

The correct grammer for your first line of enquiry to Shinobuchan is &quot;how does bad grammer reduce your credibility?&quot;.

Anyhow, it is pretty specific in some points such as power connector details and some such, however, it is very little of importance to most gamers/end users...
We would appreciate if we got more info on benches and porojected release date... speculation on prices etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Coma,</p>
<p>The correct grammer for your first line of enquiry to Shinobuchan is &#8220;how does bad grammer reduce your credibility?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyhow, it is pretty specific in some points such as power connector details and some such, however, it is very little of importance to most gamers/end users&#8230;<br />
We would appreciate if we got more info on benches and porojected release date&#8230; speculation on prices etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1352</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1352</guid>
		<description>shinobuchan, this is a chinese website... don&#039;t expect their grammar to be top notch

however, their information seems pretty reliable so far</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shinobuchan, this is a chinese website&#8230; don&#8217;t expect their grammar to be top notch</p>
<p>however, their information seems pretty reliable so far</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 01:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>@Max, 
ya, we don&#039;t get it either. NVIDIA is using a weird naming scheme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Max,<br />
ya, we don&#8217;t get it either. NVIDIA is using a weird naming scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>Я не понял, а где обещаная 9800 Ultra ??? Хачу ультру....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Я не понял, а где обещаная 9800 Ultra ??? Хачу ультру&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-998</guid>
		<description>@ Shinobuchan,

personally i think you should put your comment to those &quot;GeForce 9800 GTX (G100) Specs revealed&quot; thread. In those thread you can only read speculation but infos here are all from reliable sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Shinobuchan,</p>
<p>personally i think you should put your comment to those &#8220;GeForce 9800 GTX (G100) Specs revealed&#8221; thread. In those thread you can only read speculation but infos here are all from reliable sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coma</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>Coma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-993</guid>
		<description>Shinobuchan, why does bad grammar reduce from your credibility?
If anything, it *adds* to it. Do you not think a person who&#039;s making something up would bother making it look realistic?

Anyway, expreview have proven to be credible with their accurate before-everybody-else G92 review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shinobuchan, why does bad grammar reduce from your credibility?<br />
If anything, it *adds* to it. Do you not think a person who&#8217;s making something up would bother making it look realistic?</p>
<p>Anyway, expreview have proven to be credible with their accurate before-everybody-else G92 review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geforce 9800 GX2 i februari at Pecekoll.se</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>Geforce 9800 GX2 i februari at Pecekoll.se</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 07:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-948</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Expreview. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Expreview. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shinobuchan</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Shinobuchan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-943</guid>
		<description>This is bullshit. Look at that wierd grammar and spelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is bullshit. Look at that wierd grammar and spelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 02:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-937</guid>
		<description>at PSOLORD:
yes.. NVIDIA wont use Gxx for their product code anymore..
the new product code is D9E/D9P etc..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at PSOLORD:<br />
yes.. NVIDIA wont use Gxx for their product code anymore..<br />
the new product code is D9E/D9P etc..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psolord</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>psolord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-896</guid>
		<description>Ok. i&#039;m confused. I know that the G100 was supposed to come out in march, not the d9e.G100 is a new chip and not a multiple chip solution. The D9E aka dual G92 will come out in january. Am i missing something here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. i&#8217;m confused. I know that the G100 was supposed to come out in march, not the d9e.G100 is a new chip and not a multiple chip solution. The D9E aka dual G92 will come out in january. Am i missing something here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nvedoa</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>Nvedoa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 06:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-858</guid>
		<description>Bull shit.............eat it...............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bull shit&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.eat it&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1P Start &#187; Blog Archive &#187; nVidia releasing 9800 GX2 in February?</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/24/d9e-coming-in-feb-19th/133.html/comment-page-1#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>1P Start &#187; Blog Archive &#187; nVidia releasing 9800 GX2 in February?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 05:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=133#comment-780</guid>
		<description>[...] Expreview, a site I’ve never heard of before now (I don’t get around, I’m sorry) is reporting that nVidia’s newest graphics card, the nVidia GeForce 9800 GX2, will be released on February 19th, 2008. We can not learn much of the card, Only knows it will be a dual GPU card and communicate with built-in SLI. It also have a SLI connector so it will become the another card supporting Quad SLI like its predecessor 7950 GX2. The power module of the card is somehow different, it have one 6pin and one 8pin power connector. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Expreview, a site I’ve never heard of before now (I don’t get around, I’m sorry) is reporting that nVidia’s newest graphics card, the nVidia GeForce 9800 GX2, will be released on February 19th, 2008. We can not learn much of the card, Only knows it will be a dual GPU card and communicate with built-in SLI. It also have a SLI connector so it will become the another card supporting Quad SLI like its predecessor 7950 GX2. The power module of the card is somehow different, it have one 6pin and one 8pin power connector. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->