<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [review]3-way SLI, a new gaming experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/26/review3-way-sli-a-new-gaming-expreience/146.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/26/review3-way-sli-a-new-gaming-expreience/146.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaGUNaMAN</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/26/review3-way-sli-a-new-gaming-expreience/146.html/comment-page-1#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>LaGUNaMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=146#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome jeff, rock on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome jeff, rock on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/26/review3-way-sli-a-new-gaming-expreience/146.html/comment-page-1#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=146#comment-999</guid>
		<description>Thank you LaGUNaMAN, i already fix the bugs..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you LaGUNaMAN, i already fix the bugs..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaGUNaMAN</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/26/review3-way-sli-a-new-gaming-expreience/146.html/comment-page-1#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>LaGUNaMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=146#comment-964</guid>
		<description>Nice review. A few edits needed though.

1. Title : 

&quot;[review]3-way SLI, a new gaming expreience&quot;

Should be - &quot;experience&quot;

2. Page 3 : 

&quot;Important: switch between 2-way SLI and 3-way SLI is sample,&quot;

Should be - &quot;Important: To switch from 3-way SLI to 2-way SLI is simple,&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review. A few edits needed though.</p>
<p>1. Title : </p>
<p>&#8220;[review]3-way SLI, a new gaming expreience&#8221;</p>
<p>Should be &#8211; &#8220;experience&#8221;</p>
<p>2. Page 3 : </p>
<p>&#8220;Important: switch between 2-way SLI and 3-way SLI is sample,&#8221;</p>
<p>Should be &#8211; &#8220;Important: To switch from 3-way SLI to 2-way SLI is simple,&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philip</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/26/review3-way-sli-a-new-gaming-expreience/146.html/comment-page-1#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=146#comment-945</guid>
		<description>yes 16+8+16 PCIe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes 16+8+16 PCIe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Croaker</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/26/review3-way-sli-a-new-gaming-expreience/146.html/comment-page-1#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>Croaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=146#comment-942</guid>
		<description>Maybe I missed something, but I thought that 680i tri-sli is not as effective due to the middle slot being 8x not 16x and thus bringing the other 2 slots down as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I missed something, but I thought that 680i tri-sli is not as effective due to the middle slot being 8x not 16x and thus bringing the other 2 slots down as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/26/review3-way-sli-a-new-gaming-expreience/146.html/comment-page-1#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=146#comment-941</guid>
		<description>@Doug Friedman,
ya, 3 hops is not good, but you forgot the PCIe-2.0. ATI&#039;s Quad CFX is based on PCIe-2.0. while 3-way SLI isn&#039;t.the CFX connector itself is not as important as SLI connector.
but i really concern about the Catalyst..you know that is not a good driver</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Doug Friedman,<br />
ya, 3 hops is not good, but you forgot the PCIe-2.0. ATI&#8217;s Quad CFX is based on PCIe-2.0. while 3-way SLI isn&#8217;t.the CFX connector itself is not as important as SLI connector.<br />
but i really concern about the Catalyst..you know that is not a good driver</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philip</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/26/review3-way-sli-a-new-gaming-expreience/146.html/comment-page-1#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 02:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=146#comment-936</guid>
		<description>FEAR is DX9 game</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FEAR is DX9 game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aledb12</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/26/review3-way-sli-a-new-gaming-expreience/146.html/comment-page-1#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>aledb12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=146#comment-920</guid>
		<description>FEAR is DX10?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FEAR is DX10?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Friedman</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/26/review3-way-sli-a-new-gaming-expreience/146.html/comment-page-1#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=146#comment-880</guid>
		<description>&quot;Don’t forget the Quad CrossfireX coming this January. Will AMD do better this time?&quot;

Hehe, from a technical perspective, the reason why Nvidia chose to do a 3way SLI(not 4way or more) is that they wanted to have direct SLI connection between every video card.  Using 2 SLI connectors, Nvidia&#039;s solution utilizes the low latency of one hop connection.  Compared to ATI&#039;s quad crossfire, the data has to jump 3 hops from the top ATI video card all the way to the bottom card, which makes the latency 3 times as high, which will cause image synchronization issues, degrading performance.

Plus, Vista without SP1 currently only support 3 frames of forward rendering in AFR mode, thus putting the limit of SLI to 3 way.  Now, SP1 will allow more GPUs, but ATI&#039;s solution is limited to the release schedule of Vista SP1.  We will see, it is getting interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Don’t forget the Quad CrossfireX coming this January. Will AMD do better this time?&#8221;</p>
<p>Hehe, from a technical perspective, the reason why Nvidia chose to do a 3way SLI(not 4way or more) is that they wanted to have direct SLI connection between every video card.  Using 2 SLI connectors, Nvidia&#8217;s solution utilizes the low latency of one hop connection.  Compared to ATI&#8217;s quad crossfire, the data has to jump 3 hops from the top ATI video card all the way to the bottom card, which makes the latency 3 times as high, which will cause image synchronization issues, degrading performance.</p>
<p>Plus, Vista without SP1 currently only support 3 frames of forward rendering in AFR mode, thus putting the limit of SLI to 3 way.  Now, SP1 will allow more GPUs, but ATI&#8217;s solution is limited to the release schedule of Vista SP1.  We will see, it is getting interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
