<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only eVGA, XFX, Palit, ASUS got G92-150 chips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/29/only-evgaxfxpalitasus-got-g92-150-chips/154.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/29/only-evgaxfxpalitasus-got-g92-150-chips/154.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gpus.exhosted.com &#187; 8800GS 384MB quick comparison with 8800GT 512MB</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/29/only-evgaxfxpalitasus-got-g92-150-chips/154.html/comment-page-1#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>gpus.exhosted.com &#187; 8800GS 384MB quick comparison with 8800GT 512MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=154#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>[...] We will receive 768MB version soon. All these cards we’ve seem is products by Palit. but later eVGA, XFX, and ASUS will also have 8800GS  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We will receive 768MB version soon. All these cards we’ve seem is products by Palit. but later eVGA, XFX, and ASUS will also have 8800GS  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 8800GS quick comparison with 8800GT 512MB</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/29/only-evgaxfxpalitasus-got-g92-150-chips/154.html/comment-page-1#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 8800GS quick comparison with 8800GT 512MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=154#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>[...] related article： Geforce 8800GS 192bit 384MB/768MB GDDR3 *Updated* 96SP actually Only eVGA, XFX, Palit, ASUS got G92-150 chips [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] related article： Geforce 8800GS 192bit 384MB/768MB GDDR3 *Updated* 96SP actually Only eVGA, XFX, Palit, ASUS got G92-150 chips [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/29/only-evgaxfxpalitasus-got-g92-150-chips/154.html/comment-page-1#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=154#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>they will focus on the Americas, that does not mean they don&#039;t sell card outside the continent :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they will focus on the Americas, that does not mean they don&#8217;t sell card outside the continent <img src='http://en.expreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2007/12/29/only-evgaxfxpalitasus-got-g92-150-chips/154.html/comment-page-1#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=154#comment-1026</guid>
		<description>Your information is incorrect about EVGA. EVGA sells their video cards in the USA, Canada, Europe, and Australia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your information is incorrect about EVGA. EVGA sells their video cards in the USA, Canada, Europe, and Australia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
