http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/08/atomic-no-sapphire-have-a-even-higher-hd3870-for-you/176.html Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews. Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:10:37 +0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/08/atomic-no-sapphire-have-a-even-higher-hd3870-for-you/176.html/comment-page-1#comment-2357 Jeff Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:26:13 +0000 http://en.expreview.com/?p=176#comment-2357 of course the default clock is 7xxMHz, because it is a RV670XT of course the default clock is 7xxMHz, because it is a RV670XT

]]> http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/08/atomic-no-sapphire-have-a-even-higher-hd3870-for-you/176.html/comment-page-1#comment-2350 abc Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:12:31 +0000 http://en.expreview.com/?p=176#comment-2350 Why the default speed of GPU in GPU-Z is covered? It's clearly seen the GPU is overclocked, because it's slightly seen the default speed of this is 7xx MHz. Why the default speed of GPU in GPU-Z is covered? It’s clearly seen the GPU is overclocked, because it’s slightly seen the default speed of this is 7xx MHz.

]]> http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/08/atomic-no-sapphire-have-a-even-higher-hd3870-for-you/176.html/comment-page-1#comment-1614 Atomic? no, Sapphire have a even higher HD3870 for you : Mark Puzzled Blog Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:18:38 +0000 http://en.expreview.com/?p=176#comment-1614 [...] unknown: [...] [...] unknown: [...]

]]>