<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9600GT launch date push back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:16:18 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: [Expreview] GigaByte 9600GT official pics leaked - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html/comment-page-1#comment-1971</link>
		<dc:creator>[Expreview] GigaByte 9600GT official pics leaked - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=223#comment-1971</guid>
		<description>[...] from PCB to cooling system, from GPU clock to I/O interface, all referenced. We can expect 9600GT hit the market soon.       Source    __________________ Click me -&gt; BUILDING my Future Rig by the end of March   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from PCB to cooling system, from GPU clock to I/O interface, all referenced. We can expect 9600GT hit the market soon.       Source    __________________ Click me -&gt; BUILDING my Future Rig by the end of March   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [Expreview] 9600GT hit the market in Feb 13, earlier than expected - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html/comment-page-1#comment-1969</link>
		<dc:creator>[Expreview] 9600GT hit the market in Feb 13, earlier than expected - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=223#comment-1969</guid>
		<description>[...] seems they don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems they don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 9600GT hit the market in Feb 13, earlier than expected</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html/comment-page-1#comment-1954</link>
		<dc:creator>Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 9600GT hit the market in Feb 13, earlier than expected</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=223#comment-1954</guid>
		<description>[...] seems they don&#8217;t care about NVIDIA&#8217;s delay notice at all, South africa website Take2 have alrealy begin selling 9600GT 512MB for 2107 ZAR, as high as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems they don&#8217;t care about NVIDIA&#8217;s delay notice at all, South africa website Take2 have alrealy begin selling 9600GT 512MB for 2107 ZAR, as high as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GigaByte 9600GT official pics leaked</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html/comment-page-1#comment-1952</link>
		<dc:creator>Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GigaByte 9600GT official pics leaked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=223#comment-1952</guid>
		<description>[...] Gigabyte&#8217;s 9600GT is a full reference card: from PCB to cooling system, from GPU clock to I/O interface, all referenced. We can expect 9600GT hit the market soon. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gigabyte&#8217;s 9600GT is a full reference card: from PCB to cooling system, from GPU clock to I/O interface, all referenced. We can expect 9600GT hit the market soon. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enthousiast</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html/comment-page-1#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator>enthousiast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=223#comment-1940</guid>
		<description>I have not purchased 9600GT GX2 because its too slow, my GT200 is 16 core sli is faster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not purchased 9600GT GX2 because its too slow, my GT200 is 16 core sli is faster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harddon</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html/comment-page-1#comment-1932</link>
		<dc:creator>harddon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=223#comment-1932</guid>
		<description>nice card. I have one laying on my dickstool/desk right now. Is NICE&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice card. I have one laying on my dickstool/desk right now. Is NICE&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrading to HD 3850 - TechEnclave</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html/comment-page-1#comment-1910</link>
		<dc:creator>Upgrading to HD 3850 - TechEnclave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=223#comment-1910</guid>
		<description>[...] and it will be pitched right up against the HD3850.  Launch date for 9600GT is 21st Feb Link-&gt;Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report! Blog Archive 9600GT launch date push back Price: $169 to $189. Link-&gt;What&#039;s the price of 9600 GT going to be like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and it will be pitched right up against the HD3850.  Launch date for 9600GT is 21st Feb Link-&gt;Expreview.com &#8211; Extra Hardware News Report! Blog Archive 9600GT launch date push back Price: $169 to $189. Link-&gt;What&#8217;s the price of 9600 GT going to be like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NVIDIA almost delay all their new products to March</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html/comment-page-1#comment-1749</link>
		<dc:creator>Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NVIDIA almost delay all their new products to March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 03:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=223#comment-1749</guid>
		<description>[...] also reported 9600GT suffering a week&#8217;s delay from Feb 14 to Feb 21, and its enemy, Radeon HD 3600 series already began selling from Jan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also reported 9600GT suffering a week&#8217;s delay from Feb 14 to Feb 21, and its enemy, Radeon HD 3600 series already began selling from Jan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La 9600GT se retrasa hasta el 21 de febrero - Noticias</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html/comment-page-1#comment-1699</link>
		<dc:creator>La 9600GT se retrasa hasta el 21 de febrero - Noticias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=223#comment-1699</guid>
		<description>[...] salida de la nueva 9600GT se retrasa hasta el día 21 de febrero, que según la web expreview se debe al fallo de voltaje &#8220;durante ciertas aplicaciones&#8221; de algunas gráficas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] salida de la nueva 9600GT se retrasa hasta el día 21 de febrero, que según la web expreview se debe al fallo de voltaje &#8220;durante ciertas aplicaciones&#8221; de algunas gráficas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 9600GT launch date push back - 3D Accelerator</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html/comment-page-1#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>9600GT launch date push back - 3D Accelerator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=223#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>[...] into Chinese New Year holiday so the launch date have to push back a week, to Feb 21st.  Source: en.expreview.com    __________________ Site Changelog 08 #3 My eyes are the victim&#039;s eyes my hands are the murder&#039;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] into Chinese New Year holiday so the launch date have to push back a week, to Feb 21st.  Source: en.expreview.com    __________________ Site Changelog 08 #3 My eyes are the victim&#8217;s eyes my hands are the murder&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [Expreview] 9600GT launch date push back - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/23/9600gt-launch-date-push-back/223.html/comment-page-1#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>[Expreview] 9600GT launch date push back - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=223#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>[...] 9600GT launch date push back     source   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9600GT launch date push back     source   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->