<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catalyst 8.1 WHQL test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/24/catalyst-81-whql-test/226.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/24/catalyst-81-whql-test/226.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PSOLORD</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/24/catalyst-81-whql-test/226.html/comment-page-1#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>PSOLORD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=226#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>My updated file. With fixes edits etc and Q6600 vs E8400 gaming!
http://rapidshare.com/files/86707820/TEST_RESULTS_26-01-08.rar
cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My updated file. With fixes edits etc and Q6600 vs E8400 gaming!<br />
<a href="http://rapidshare.com/files/86707820/TEST_RESULTS_26-01-08.rar" rel="nofollow">http://rapidshare.com/files/86707820/TEST_RESULTS_26-01-08.rar</a><br />
cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PSOLORD</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/24/catalyst-81-whql-test/226.html/comment-page-1#comment-1743</link>
		<dc:creator>PSOLORD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=226#comment-1743</guid>
		<description>FORGOT TO MENTION THE RESOLUTION AND SOME OTHER THINGS
RES 1680*1050
MEM CORSAIR XMS2 PC6400</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FORGOT TO MENTION THE RESOLUTION AND SOME OTHER THINGS<br />
RES 1680*1050<br />
MEM CORSAIR XMS2 PC6400</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psolord</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/24/catalyst-81-whql-test/226.html/comment-page-1#comment-1720</link>
		<dc:creator>psolord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=226#comment-1720</guid>
		<description>Hello guys! Here is my new updated file with catalyst 8.1 results against my previous benches.

http://rapidshare.com/files/86306797/TEST_RESULTS.rar.html

Nothing great about the new tests actually. Only in lost planet i noticed huge performance gain with the 8.1 driver.

Also as you will see i am starting bencmarking 3870 with oc Q6600@3600mhz vs oc E8400@4200mhz. It is very early but he first two games i tested, call of duty 4 and supreme commander run faster on the Q6600 which for me is surprise since multithreading is not fully implemented in games yet! But maybe those too are actually more multithreaded than some other older games.

If expreview would be so king to make a similar test it would be great.

Of course I will continue testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello guys! Here is my new updated file with catalyst 8.1 results against my previous benches.</p>
<p><a href="http://rapidshare.com/files/86306797/TEST_RESULTS.rar.html" rel="nofollow">http://rapidshare.com/files/86306797/TEST_RESULTS.rar.html</a></p>
<p>Nothing great about the new tests actually. Only in lost planet i noticed huge performance gain with the 8.1 driver.</p>
<p>Also as you will see i am starting bencmarking 3870 with oc Q6600@3600mhz vs oc E8400@4200mhz. It is very early but he first two games i tested, call of duty 4 and supreme commander run faster on the Q6600 which for me is surprise since multithreading is not fully implemented in games yet! But maybe those too are actually more multithreaded than some other older games.</p>
<p>If expreview would be so king to make a similar test it would be great.</p>
<p>Of course I will continue testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/24/catalyst-81-whql-test/226.html/comment-page-1#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=226#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>I see this was tested on a 3850.  Why not the 3870 which most people use?  I know for a fact that 8.1 increased my 3dmark06 score by over 100.  Other people reported higher yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this was tested on a 3850.  Why not the 3870 which most people use?  I know for a fact that 8.1 increased my 3dmark06 score by over 100.  Other people reported higher yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/24/catalyst-81-whql-test/226.html/comment-page-1#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=226#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>the new driver is coming, in the 8.2 test we will test Crysis for sure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the new driver is coming, in the 8.2 test we will test Crysis for sure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rasamaha</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/01/24/catalyst-81-whql-test/226.html/comment-page-1#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>rasamaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=226#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>It will be very nice to see crysis...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be very nice to see crysis&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
