<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9800GTX 3Dmark06 score here, don&#8217;t be too excited *Update*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marguerita Pouche</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-3#comment-26162</link>
		<dc:creator>Marguerita Pouche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-26162</guid>
		<description>Document truly like genital herpes virus treatments publish here. Incredibly useful and additionally smart. Just one dilemma however. I’m operating Chrome by means of Debian and additionally elements on your present design creations are really a smaller wonky. Document understand it’s truly common created. However it’s a little something to make sure you preserve in mind. Document hope that hot weather will certainly benefit and additionally continue to keep up the top notch superior quality making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Document truly like genital herpes virus treatments publish here. Incredibly useful and additionally smart. Just one dilemma however. I’m operating Chrome by means of Debian and additionally elements on your present design creations are really a smaller wonky. Document understand it’s truly common created. However it’s a little something to make sure you preserve in mind. Document hope that hot weather will certainly benefit and additionally continue to keep up the top notch superior quality making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sukanya Tripathi</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-3#comment-24930</link>
		<dc:creator>Sukanya Tripathi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-24930</guid>
		<description>Good post, thanks! I really love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, thanks! I really love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homemade Pussy</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-23952</link>
		<dc:creator>Homemade Pussy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 02:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-23952</guid>
		<description>every racing game is addictive, specially Need For Speed. it really rocks;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>every racing game is addictive, specially Need For Speed. it really rocks;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caramoan Package Tour</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-23376</link>
		<dc:creator>Caramoan Package Tour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-23376</guid>
		<description>dining room furnitures should be coated with shellac or varnish in order to preserve the wood grains*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dining room furnitures should be coated with shellac or varnish in order to preserve the wood grains*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayden</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-4477</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-4477</guid>
		<description>Erik, my pc for that test was completely stock speeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik, my pc for that test was completely stock speeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayden</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-4476</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-4476</guid>
		<description>the 9800GTX is a PCIE 2.0 compatible, why the hell cant it?
using a version 1.0 mobo limits its performance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 9800GTX is a PCIE 2.0 compatible, why the hell cant it?<br />
using a version 1.0 mobo limits its performance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-4250</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-4250</guid>
		<description>You can OC your 9800GTX as high as u want, you will never fulfill the PCI1.0 bandwidth. 70% capacity on PCI1.0 is bullshit. Even 9800GX2 doesn&#039;t reach the PCIE1.0 standards...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can OC your 9800GTX as high as u want, you will never fulfill the PCI1.0 bandwidth. 70% capacity on PCI1.0 is bullshit. Even 9800GX2 doesn&#8217;t reach the PCIE1.0 standards&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayden</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-4038</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-4038</guid>
		<description>Ive got an EVGA 9800GTX SSC edition, it fuckin shits all over this. FYI this 9800 is standard, the 9800GTX has huge OC potential, and the core and memory speeds are way above what it could be. 

My single 9800GTX scored 15k on 3DMark06, running on a PCI-Ex16 mobo with only PCI-E v1.0,, only about 70% capacity.. 4Gb DDR2 800 ram, E8400 @ 3GHz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive got an EVGA 9800GTX SSC edition, it fuckin shits all over this. FYI this 9800 is standard, the 9800GTX has huge OC potential, and the core and memory speeds are way above what it could be. </p>
<p>My single 9800GTX scored 15k on 3DMark06, running on a PCI-Ex16 mobo with only PCI-E v1.0,, only about 70% capacity.. 4Gb DDR2 800 ram, E8400 @ 3GHz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-3791</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-3791</guid>
		<description>Quote:DarkElfa Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 2:56 am

@GUYZ

…and if you had half a brain, you’d realized that all this info on the 9800GTX is complete bullcrap. It’s fake. I’ll bet the life of my children that this info is either entirely made up or whatever card they got their hands on wasn’t a 9800GTX. Life of my kids guys. This is garbage.
_______________________________


Lawl your kids are dead... -im sure this guy has kids..
- If you &#039;fuck-tards&#039; are going to be hardcore critics buy water cooling blocks- oc your wanna-be rigs and see the numbers with high res and high AA- on benchmarks you can see these card not doing as well on benchmarks at low res- look up on toms hardware or other benchmarks- these cards remain much more stable at higher res as an 8800gt will drop drastically on ex. crisis high res.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote:DarkElfa Says:<br />
February 27th, 2008 at 2:56 am</p>
<p>@GUYZ</p>
<p>…and if you had half a brain, you’d realized that all this info on the 9800GTX is complete bullcrap. It’s fake. I’ll bet the life of my children that this info is either entirely made up or whatever card they got their hands on wasn’t a 9800GTX. Life of my kids guys. This is garbage.<br />
_______________________________</p>
<p>Lawl your kids are dead&#8230; -im sure this guy has kids..<br />
- If you &#8216;fuck-tards&#8217; are going to be hardcore critics buy water cooling blocks- oc your wanna-be rigs and see the numbers with high res and high AA- on benchmarks you can see these card not doing as well on benchmarks at low res- look up on toms hardware or other benchmarks- these cards remain much more stable at higher res as an 8800gt will drop drastically on ex. crisis high res.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whatever</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-3442</link>
		<dc:creator>Whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 03:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-3442</guid>
		<description>I would seriously question the validity of this test. When I can reach 14,400 on my 8800 gts (g92) on q6600 @ 3.3ghz If I overclock the card I can get 15890. There is no reason that the 9800gtx with better bandwith and faster mem clock shouldn&#039;t beat my scores easily. It just doesn&#039;t make sense mathmatically since they&#039;re based on the same core.

There are also many other variables to consider before you say this card is junk. Granted it&#039;s not what a GTX should be, but... If your running vista -1000 points, crappy ram -200 to 400pts, both of these negatives I have personal experience with, hence the reason I dual boot and still use xp for games and got better ram.

Plus these scores are old, do some research at 3dmarks website. there are plenty of people getting between 15k and 20k on single cards oc&#039;ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would seriously question the validity of this test. When I can reach 14,400 on my 8800 gts (g92) on q6600 @ 3.3ghz If I overclock the card I can get 15890. There is no reason that the 9800gtx with better bandwith and faster mem clock shouldn&#8217;t beat my scores easily. It just doesn&#8217;t make sense mathmatically since they&#8217;re based on the same core.</p>
<p>There are also many other variables to consider before you say this card is junk. Granted it&#8217;s not what a GTX should be, but&#8230; If your running vista -1000 points, crappy ram -200 to 400pts, both of these negatives I have personal experience with, hence the reason I dual boot and still use xp for games and got better ram.</p>
<p>Plus these scores are old, do some research at 3dmarks website. there are plenty of people getting between 15k and 20k on single cards oc&#8217;ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: more4less</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-3231</link>
		<dc:creator>more4less</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 07:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-3231</guid>
		<description>SINGLE 3870 WILL R@PE THIS CARD WITH CPU ON SAME SPEED. AND FOR THE PRICE OF THIS SINGLE NVIDIA CARD U HAVE DUAL 3870!

NVIDIA SUX. TO THINK OF THERE ARE STILL PEOPLE WHO THINK NVIDIA CRDS BEAT ATI LOL HARD HEADED NOOBS. W8 FOR 4870.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SINGLE 3870 WILL R@PE THIS CARD WITH CPU ON SAME SPEED. AND FOR THE PRICE OF THIS SINGLE NVIDIA CARD U HAVE DUAL 3870!</p>
<p>NVIDIA SUX. TO THINK OF THERE ARE STILL PEOPLE WHO THINK NVIDIA CRDS BEAT ATI LOL HARD HEADED NOOBS. W8 FOR 4870.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-3160</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-3160</guid>
		<description>Also, all of the PROFESSIONAL reviews (IE, not E-nerds that think they know everything) prove and show that the 9800GTX outperforms all cards in video game testing EXCEPT the 8800u, which as I already stated is almost twice the cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, all of the PROFESSIONAL reviews (IE, not E-nerds that think they know everything) prove and show that the 9800GTX outperforms all cards in video game testing EXCEPT the 8800u, which as I already stated is almost twice the cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-3159</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-3159</guid>
		<description>The post above me is the only post worth reading in the entire page. You guys are whining like babies because you E-nerds were expecting a card that could transport you inside your computer, but what NVidia came out with is a card that offers almost top notch performance at almost half the cost of the 8800u, which is pretty well worth it in my opinion. Not to mention the power consumption is much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post above me is the only post worth reading in the entire page. You guys are whining like babies because you E-nerds were expecting a card that could transport you inside your computer, but what NVidia came out with is a card that offers almost top notch performance at almost half the cost of the 8800u, which is pretty well worth it in my opinion. Not to mention the power consumption is much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retardsmacker</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-2979</link>
		<dc:creator>retardsmacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-2979</guid>
		<description>ok retards, i&#039;m sick of people dogging this gtx.  It&#039;s not the 8800gtx, but it&#039;s reasonably close @ half the price of the ultra.  Everyone keeps comparing this card to the 8800gtx and ultra, but they&#039;re too damn dumb to note that it&#039;s half the price.  A card that runs just under an ultra for 330 bucks is amazing.  

Quite being a bunch of retards and actually look at it for what it is, a great bang for the buck card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok retards, i&#8217;m sick of people dogging this gtx.  It&#8217;s not the 8800gtx, but it&#8217;s reasonably close @ half the price of the ultra.  Everyone keeps comparing this card to the 8800gtx and ultra, but they&#8217;re too damn dumb to note that it&#8217;s half the price.  A card that runs just under an ultra for 330 bucks is amazing.  </p>
<p>Quite being a bunch of retards and actually look at it for what it is, a great bang for the buck card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuf</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-2958</link>
		<dc:creator>stuf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-2958</guid>
		<description>Stfu, the 9800GTX is better than 8800GT and 8800GTS I don&#039;t care about what you can do when you have dry ice on your graphics card.  These are just one shot scores, IN GAME, is where it counts.  I know for a fact you don&#039;t overclock your CPUs to 6GHz and what not while playing a game...  Your computer would explode, stop being so POV and trying to make your piece of shit look good by bashing on something else with one shot scores.  You&#039;re all pathetic :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stfu, the 9800GTX is better than 8800GT and 8800GTS I don&#8217;t care about what you can do when you have dry ice on your graphics card.  These are just one shot scores, IN GAME, is where it counts.  I know for a fact you don&#8217;t overclock your CPUs to 6GHz and what not while playing a game&#8230;  Your computer would explode, stop being so POV and trying to make your piece of shit look good by bashing on something else with one shot scores.  You&#8217;re all pathetic <img src='http://en.expreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spAde</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-2865</link>
		<dc:creator>spAde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-2865</guid>
		<description>@ Greg,

I get around 15k with my CPU @ 3.7ghz and a stock GTS.  A stock GTX with a 3.6ghz quad will be around mid 16k.  I know it, because I&#039;ve seen it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Greg,</p>
<p>I get around 15k with my CPU @ 3.7ghz and a stock GTS.  A stock GTX with a 3.6ghz quad will be around mid 16k.  I know it, because I&#8217;ve seen it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spAde</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>spAde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-2864</guid>
		<description>Anyone who is a regular user of 3DMark06 knows this is fake.  That isn&#039;t how scores scale with CPU speed, not at all.

 http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/03/geforce-9800gtx-review/ 

Go here to see expreview.com&#039;s credibility destroyed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who is a regular user of 3DMark06 knows this is fake.  That isn&#8217;t how scores scale with CPU speed, not at all.</p>
<p> <a href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/03/geforce-9800gtx-review/" rel="nofollow">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/03/geforce-9800gtx-review/</a> </p>
<p>Go here to see expreview.com&#8217;s credibility destroyed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Master</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/26/9800gtx-3dmark06-score-here-dont-be-too-excited/280.html/comment-page-2#comment-2808</link>
		<dc:creator>Master</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=280#comment-2808</guid>
		<description>Well makes interesting reading, however I have a e6850, O/C to 3.93 and a standard GTX 8800 O/C. I managed to get 13300, might not seem as good as some of the others on here , however when you consider its a dual core , not a quad core, and its a standard GTX which actuall only cost me £234 inc vat a P&amp;P. I Think it`s pretty good. These were also achieved on vista 64 OS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well makes interesting reading, however I have a e6850, O/C to 3.93 and a standard GTX 8800 O/C. I managed to get 13300, might not seem as good as some of the others on here , however when you consider its a dual core , not a quad core, and its a standard GTX which actuall only cost me £234 inc vat a P&amp;P. I Think it`s pretty good. These were also achieved on vista 64 OS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
