<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ATI Catalyst 8.3, worth the wait?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/287.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/287.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:57:30 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Catalyst 8.3 to be release today, AMD said it scales good - Expreview.com</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/287.html/comment-page-1#comment-2311</link>
		<dc:creator>Catalyst 8.3 to be release today, AMD said it scales good - Expreview.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/#comment-2311</guid>
		<description>[...] published Catalyst 8.3 press release yesterday  here. And before all this someone have already ran a test based on dual 3870 X2, and the score are very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] published Catalyst 8.3 press release yesterday  here. And before all this someone have already ran a test based on dual 3870 X2, and the score are very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/287.html/comment-page-1#comment-2309</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 04:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/#comment-2309</guid>
		<description>To hassan,yes. Vista exclusive and only supports DX9 games for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To hassan,yes. Vista exclusive and only supports DX9 games for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hassan</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/287.html/comment-page-1#comment-2304</link>
		<dc:creator>Hassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/#comment-2304</guid>
		<description>Is this Vista exclusive ,f yes then i am lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this Vista exclusive ,f yes then i am lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CFX questions.. - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/287.html/comment-page-1#comment-2283</link>
		<dc:creator>CFX questions.. - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/#comment-2283</guid>
		<description>[...]   btw, are there any specific mobo&#039;s i need for CFX?  thanks     Yes you can CFX 3870x2 with 3870.  Good Link    __________________ Please ignor my spelling and grama! FAQ:s   I have a slow computer can i run [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   btw, are there any specific mobo&#8217;s i need for CFX?  thanks     Yes you can CFX 3870&#215;2 with 3870.  Good Link    __________________ Please ignor my spelling and grama! FAQ:s   I have a slow computer can i run [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dude</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/287.html/comment-page-1#comment-2282</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/#comment-2282</guid>
		<description>So what about the &quot;4800&quot; series?  People are assuming that hybrid xfire will work between a &quot;4800&quot; and a 3800 but the future applicability has not been presented yet.  It would be nice if we could keep mix matching cards together, old and new, to stack up a nice quad xfirex system.  3870x2 + 4870x2 support would be ideal since you could dive into an x2 now and reap the rewards when the 4870x2 comes out.  That could be dreaming though…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what about the &#8220;4800&#8243; series?  People are assuming that hybrid xfire will work between a &#8220;4800&#8243; and a 3800 but the future applicability has not been presented yet.  It would be nice if we could keep mix matching cards together, old and new, to stack up a nice quad xfirex system.  3870&#215;2 + 4870&#215;2 support would be ideal since you could dive into an x2 now and reap the rewards when the 4870&#215;2 comes out.  That could be dreaming though…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/287.html/comment-page-1#comment-2279</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/02/29/ati-catalyst-83-worth-the-wait/#comment-2279</guid>
		<description>Now this looks very nice indeed. Good job Amd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this looks very nice indeed. Good job Amd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->