<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: memory size 768MB? GeForce 9800GTX info sum-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/294.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/294.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:10:37 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Another NDA-free review of 9800GX2 and 9800GTX - Expreview.com</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/294.html/comment-page-1#comment-2540</link>
		<dc:creator>Another NDA-free review of 9800GX2 and 9800GTX - Expreview.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/#comment-2540</guid>
		<description>[...] Hmm, look at  9800GTX, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hmm, look at  9800GTX, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mushu</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/294.html/comment-page-1#comment-2514</link>
		<dc:creator>Mushu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/#comment-2514</guid>
		<description>Rip-off? Na. Just like the 9600 GT and 8800 GT, MSI or some other company will sell a 1 GB version... I cant believe I had to spell that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rip-off? Na. Just like the 9600 GT and 8800 GT, MSI or some other company will sell a 1 GB version&#8230; I cant believe I had to spell that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What a rip-off!</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/294.html/comment-page-1#comment-2453</link>
		<dc:creator>What a rip-off!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/#comment-2453</guid>
		<description>399€ is ~$600, what a nasty price considering its really shabby performance.
You can get an 8800gtx w/ full 768mb/384bit for significantly less, e.g. $359 at newegg.

Of course it&#039;s only 512mb/256bit, it&#039;s only a slightly OCed 8800gts after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>399€ is ~$600, what a nasty price considering its really shabby performance.<br />
You can get an 8800gtx w/ full 768mb/384bit for significantly less, e.g. $359 at newegg.</p>
<p>Of course it&#8217;s only 512mb/256bit, it&#8217;s only a slightly OCed 8800gts after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomarniblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GeForce 9800GTX und 9800GTS schneller als vermutet</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/294.html/comment-page-1#comment-2410</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomarniblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GeForce 9800GTX und 9800GTS schneller als vermutet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/#comment-2410</guid>
		<description>[...] Quelle   Bookmark Diese Icons verzweigen auf soziale Netzwerke bei denen Nutzer neue Inhalte finden und [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quelle   Bookmark Diese Icons verzweigen auf soziale Netzwerke bei denen Nutzer neue Inhalte finden und [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tc</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/294.html/comment-page-1#comment-2370</link>
		<dc:creator>tc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/#comment-2370</guid>
		<description>Personally I would bet its 512mb.  All of the new cards come in either 512 or 1gb.  Not that I will ever get this card.  I&#039;m happy with my ati 3870 which supports all the latest graphic standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I would bet its 512mb.  All of the new cards come in either 512 or 1gb.  Not that I will ever get this card.  I&#8217;m happy with my ati 3870 which supports all the latest graphic standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/294.html/comment-page-1#comment-2368</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/07/memory-size-768mb-geforce-9800gtx-info-sum-up/#comment-2368</guid>
		<description>WTF they got the specs wrong ,then how did they do the benchmarks without checking out the mhz and stuff
they shudive corrected the mistake before they made the benchmark last week 
there is something strange going on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF they got the specs wrong ,then how did they do the benchmarks without checking out the mhz and stuff<br />
they shudive corrected the mistake before they made the benchmark last week<br />
there is something strange going on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->