<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NVIDIA shady trick to 9600GT following-up #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/20/nvidia-shady-trick-to-9600gt-following-up-2/310.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/20/nvidia-shady-trick-to-9600gt-following-up-2/310.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8800GTS (G92) OCing (840/2206/2098), experimentation/thoughts - Page 2 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/20/nvidia-shady-trick-to-9600gt-following-up-2/310.html/comment-page-1#comment-3005</link>
		<dc:creator>8800GTS (G92) OCing (840/2206/2098), experimentation/thoughts - Page 2 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/20/nvidia-shady-trick-to-9600gt-following-up-2/#comment-3005</guid>
		<description>[...] it was the 9600gt that could be overclocked by bumping up the PCIe bus frequency(on certain mobos). -More here-   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it was the 9600gt that could be overclocked by bumping up the PCIe bus frequency(on certain mobos). -More here-   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [TPU] 9600GT secret exposed - Page 4 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/20/nvidia-shady-trick-to-9600gt-following-up-2/310.html/comment-page-1#comment-2624</link>
		<dc:creator>[TPU] 9600GT secret exposed - Page 4 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/20/nvidia-shady-trick-to-9600gt-following-up-2/#comment-2624</guid>
		<description>[...] in future chips.  We said: We have found one of the future product also have the same method.    Update at expreview, there has been no follow up at TPU that I could find.    __________________  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in future chips.  We said: We have found one of the future product also have the same method.    Update at expreview, there has been no follow up at TPU that I could find.    __________________  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slim Shady</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/20/nvidia-shady-trick-to-9600gt-following-up-2/310.html/comment-page-1#comment-2602</link>
		<dc:creator>Slim Shady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/20/nvidia-shady-trick-to-9600gt-following-up-2/#comment-2602</guid>
		<description>This just confirms TPU&#039;s title was right on the spot:
1.&quot;shady&quot;- not disclosing such &quot;innovation&quot; to start with, and keeping mum for almost a month.
2.&quot;trick&quot;- when your card is overclocked without your knowledge, and the lack of utility to even tell you the accurate clock I would feel tricked. If I want to OC I will do it myself or buy OC version.
It is cheating regardless of what the (new) possibilities are. The fact is this &quot;innovation&quot; distorts the benchmark results published and Nvidia&#039;s results benefit from every bit of it. Whether it was intentional or not, or whether it changes the results a lot or not, it doesn&#039;t matter. The fact is they got caught.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just confirms TPU&#8217;s title was right on the spot:<br />
1.&#8221;shady&#8221;- not disclosing such &#8220;innovation&#8221; to start with, and keeping mum for almost a month.<br />
2.&#8221;trick&#8221;- when your card is overclocked without your knowledge, and the lack of utility to even tell you the accurate clock I would feel tricked. If I want to OC I will do it myself or buy OC version.<br />
It is cheating regardless of what the (new) possibilities are. The fact is this &#8220;innovation&#8221; distorts the benchmark results published and Nvidia&#8217;s results benefit from every bit of it. Whether it was intentional or not, or whether it changes the results a lot or not, it doesn&#8217;t matter. The fact is they got caught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
