[Review]GeForce 9600GT 256MB
â—†9600GT 256MB vs 512MB
Of course,9600GT 256MB surly performs worse than 9600GT 512MB. In the low resolution and 0AA0AF, 256MB version still can catch up with 512MB version. But when we increase resolution and AA,AF, the card just fail to follow. After filtered all items lower than 25FPS, 256MB version loses 12.7% than 512MB.
Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: A closer look
Page 3: HD video playback test
Page 4: Power comsumption test
Page 5: Overclocking and temperature test
Page 6: Test bed and remark
Page 7: 9600GT 256MB vs HD3850 256MB
Page 8: 9600GT 256MB vs 512MB
Page 9: 9600 GT 256MB vs 8800 GS 384MB
Page 10: Final conclusion
March 29th, 2008 at 8:39 am
[…] pricing tactic on HD 3850 or HD 3830, let’s have a close look at the 9600GT 256MB. Source __________________ Please ignor my spelling and grama! FAQ:s I have a slow computer can i run […]
March 29th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
fatal1ty.
LOL.
March 31st, 2008 at 8:51 pm
Fuck you niga’ass. Kiss my cunt.
April 1st, 2008 at 12:23 am
It this the 9600 gs that rumor to launch in May?
July 25th, 2008 at 5:52 am
[…] àú äáé÷åøú äæå: [Review]GeForce 9600GT 256MB - Expreview.com îñúáø ùâéøñàú ä256MB ùì ä9600GT çìùä îàåã,åàôéìå äHD3850 òå÷ó àåúä áîöáéí îñåééîéí.àðé çåùá ùàìê […]