<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GT200 to become 9900GTX and 9900GX2, launch date set to July*Update*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-5377</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-5377</guid>
		<description>fuck this im sticking with my 9800 Gx2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fuck this im sticking with my 9800 Gx2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geforce 9900 mit GT200-Chip - Phils Hardware-Blog</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-4420</link>
		<dc:creator>Geforce 9900 mit GT200-Chip - Phils Hardware-Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-4420</guid>
		<description>[...] auf der chinesischen Webseite expreview.com (Englische Übersetzung) zu lesen ist, soll die neue GT200-GPU in einer 9900 GTX (Single-GPU) sowie [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] auf der chinesischen Webseite expreview.com (Englische Übersetzung) zu lesen ist, soll die neue GT200-GPU in einer 9900 GTX (Single-GPU) sowie [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benand1985</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-3604</link>
		<dc:creator>Benand1985</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-3604</guid>
		<description>If you look at the video cards as a whole and you look at the current interface that these new cards are supposed to be running at full capacity on, the 9800 GX2 is not that big of an improvement over the 8800 Ultra.  In many cases the 8800 Ultra even out-preformed the 9800 GX2.  Personally I feel that nVidia is still working on fully utilizing the new technology of the newer supported DDR3 and PCIe-2.0 on the system boards. Since these items are in their infancy it is obvious that things might not have been implemented correctly.  Yet as it was stated earlier the 9900 is the gum or crack filler in between releases but when you look at the general scheme of things the 790i motherboards were released during the or before the 790i  chipset so it is very possible that the integration of the 9800 GX2 is not working at the full speeds as intended because the scope of their development did not include the 790i architecture or the PCIe 2.0 architecture.  Therefore, since these video cards are going to be built for PCIe 2.0 the 9800 GX2 is actually the crack filler where the 9900 GX2 will be an improvement and will utilize more of the chipset and speed of the newer motherboards and PCIe 2.0.  

Since the technology of PCIe 2.0 is so new it actuly makes more sence to wait for the video cards which are released after their first PCIe 2.0 compliment graphics cards or basically waiting for the next revision or later release.  In other words &quot;Wait until the technology has been perfected!&quot; by just buying the latest and greatest you set yourself up for failure since there are many revisions and changes that can happen after a new technological release.  Yet since  some people chose not to wait and got caught in the cross fire they are now whining about it.  

It is not anyones fault if you can&#039;t do the research into the new releases and/or wait to blow your wad when the technology has been perfected.  I plan on getting 2 9900 GX2 Cards since PCIe 2.0 has been release along with the 790i chipset.  The only thing nVidia can do is improve on the new technology.  

Furthermore, I have had 3 ATI cards burn out on me due to shotty traces and at this point I am not turning back from nVidia.  Furthermore, nVidia works the best with Linux in my opinion and I am very happy with the Driver supports &quot;Thumbs Up To nVidia.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the video cards as a whole and you look at the current interface that these new cards are supposed to be running at full capacity on, the 9800 GX2 is not that big of an improvement over the 8800 Ultra.  In many cases the 8800 Ultra even out-preformed the 9800 GX2.  Personally I feel that nVidia is still working on fully utilizing the new technology of the newer supported DDR3 and PCIe-2.0 on the system boards. Since these items are in their infancy it is obvious that things might not have been implemented correctly.  Yet as it was stated earlier the 9900 is the gum or crack filler in between releases but when you look at the general scheme of things the 790i motherboards were released during the or before the 790i  chipset so it is very possible that the integration of the 9800 GX2 is not working at the full speeds as intended because the scope of their development did not include the 790i architecture or the PCIe 2.0 architecture.  Therefore, since these video cards are going to be built for PCIe 2.0 the 9800 GX2 is actually the crack filler where the 9900 GX2 will be an improvement and will utilize more of the chipset and speed of the newer motherboards and PCIe 2.0.  </p>
<p>Since the technology of PCIe 2.0 is so new it actuly makes more sence to wait for the video cards which are released after their first PCIe 2.0 compliment graphics cards or basically waiting for the next revision or later release.  In other words &#8220;Wait until the technology has been perfected!&#8221; by just buying the latest and greatest you set yourself up for failure since there are many revisions and changes that can happen after a new technological release.  Yet since  some people chose not to wait and got caught in the cross fire they are now whining about it.  </p>
<p>It is not anyones fault if you can&#8217;t do the research into the new releases and/or wait to blow your wad when the technology has been perfected.  I plan on getting 2 9900 GX2 Cards since PCIe 2.0 has been release along with the 790i chipset.  The only thing nVidia can do is improve on the new technology.  </p>
<p>Furthermore, I have had 3 ATI cards burn out on me due to shotty traces and at this point I am not turning back from nVidia.  Furthermore, nVidia works the best with Linux in my opinion and I am very happy with the Driver supports &#8220;Thumbs Up To nVidia.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-3459</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 11:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-3459</guid>
		<description>lol what are they going to do next 10800GTX doesnt sound right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol what are they going to do next 10800GTX doesnt sound right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: auliashinta</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-3373</link>
		<dc:creator>auliashinta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-3373</guid>
		<description>new product every 4-5months ? with this price ?
i think better go to ATI, its cheaper, even if ATI&#039;s new product go out every 3 months...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new product every 4-5months ? with this price ?<br />
i think better go to ATI, its cheaper, even if ATI&#8217;s new product go out every 3 months&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-3362</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-3362</guid>
		<description>WoW, Another of nVidia rechew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WoW, Another of nVidia rechew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhruba Bandopadhyay : Blog Archive : Nvidia 9900 series due for release soon</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-3258</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhruba Bandopadhyay : Blog Archive : Nvidia 9900 series due for release soon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 12:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-3258</guid>
		<description>[...] an online version of the article as well. The original source of the rumours/information is in fact ExPreview. This is exciting news - I will be getting the 9900 series as soon as it comes out as it will no [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an online version of the article as well. The original source of the rumours/information is in fact ExPreview. This is exciting news &#8211; I will be getting the 9900 series as soon as it comes out as it will no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-3204</link>
		<dc:creator>n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 20:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-3204</guid>
		<description>Re: 9800 GTX

The 9800 GTX is a great card.  It out perfroms the 3870 X2...even the 8800 GTX and Ultra.  It is the fastest single GPU solution available right now.  You get more performance from two 9800 GTXs in SLI than you get from a single 9800 GX2.  Three 9800 GTXs in Tri-SLI out perform two 9800 GX2s in SLI.  I&#039;d hardly call that bubble gum there &quot;Kring&quot;.  In a number of games a single 9800 GTX out performs a single 9800 GX2.  So, IF it is bubble gum, it sure is good gum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: 9800 GTX</p>
<p>The 9800 GTX is a great card.  It out perfroms the 3870 X2&#8230;even the 8800 GTX and Ultra.  It is the fastest single GPU solution available right now.  You get more performance from two 9800 GTXs in SLI than you get from a single 9800 GX2.  Three 9800 GTXs in Tri-SLI out perform two 9800 GX2s in SLI.  I&#8217;d hardly call that bubble gum there &#8220;Kring&#8221;.  In a number of games a single 9800 GTX out performs a single 9800 GX2.  So, IF it is bubble gum, it sure is good gum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geforce_9800gx2 - forum.racedepartment.com</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-3172</link>
		<dc:creator>geforce_9800gx2 - forum.racedepartment.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 20:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-3172</guid>
		<description>[...] loads of rumours flying round about 9900gtx&#039;s and a 9900gx2 in June/July &#039;08. Here&#039;s a couple  GT200 to become 9900GTX and 9900GX2, launch date set to July*Update* - Expreview.com  9900GTX &amp; 9900GTS to be released as soon as early July - Overclock3D Forums  I&#039;m holding off [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] loads of rumours flying round about 9900gtx&#8217;s and a 9900gx2 in June/July &#8217;08. Here&#8217;s a couple  GT200 to become 9900GTX and 9900GX2, launch date set to July*Update* &#8211; Expreview.com  9900GTX &amp; 9900GTS to be released as soon as early July &#8211; Overclock3D Forums  I&#8217;m holding off [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Build advice/suggestions, anything plz</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-3112</link>
		<dc:creator>First Build advice/suggestions, anything plz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-3112</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally Posted by sswilson   Did you have a look at the Gigabyte 8800GTS at NCIX http://www.ncix.com/products/index.p...cture=Gigabyte ?  Not only is this card less expensive, but the version they&#039;re shipping is already clocked to 700!!! :)  I understand you might specifically want EVGA due to brand preference, but it&#039;s worth a look.      i have now   but i really like the 3months stepup from evga also considering nvidia is releasing(?) new gt200 chip in july  GT200 to become 9900GTX and 9900GX2, launch date set to July*Update* - Expreview.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by sswilson   Did you have a look at the Gigabyte 8800GTS at NCIX <a href="http://www.ncix.com/products/index.p...cture=Gigabyte" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncix.com/products/index.p&#8230;cture=Gigabyte</a> ?  Not only is this card less expensive, but the version they&#8217;re shipping is already clocked to 700!!! <img src='http://en.expreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I understand you might specifically want EVGA due to brand preference, but it&#8217;s worth a look.      i have now   but i really like the 3months stepup from evga also considering nvidia is releasing(?) new gt200 chip in july  GT200 to become 9900GTX and 9900GX2, launch date set to July*Update* &#8211; Expreview.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SemRumo</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-3070</link>
		<dc:creator>SemRumo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-3070</guid>
		<description>They had to get rid of the last G92 chips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They had to get rid of the last G92 chips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philip</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-2970</link>
		<dc:creator>philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-2970</guid>
		<description>july</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>july</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xt0m</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-2969</link>
		<dc:creator>xt0m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-2969</guid>
		<description>When was this updated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When was this updated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeForce 9800GX2 will be EOLed in three months - Expreview.com</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-2876</link>
		<dc:creator>GeForce 9800GX2 will be EOLed in three months - Expreview.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 03:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-2876</guid>
		<description>[...] is preparing two  GT200 card, the single GPU 9900GTX and dual GPU 9900GX2. It seems one of the card will not only have a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is preparing two  GT200 card, the single GPU 9900GTX and dual GPU 9900GX2. It seems one of the card will not only have a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wktech</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator>wktech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-2874</guid>
		<description>&quot;9800 GTX is NOT disappointing. It costs almost half of a 8800 Ultra and gives the same performance. Could you have imagined a similar perf/price a year ago ?&quot;

yep... it&#039;s called ATI!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;9800 GTX is NOT disappointing. It costs almost half of a 8800 Ultra and gives the same performance. Could you have imagined a similar perf/price a year ago ?&#8221;</p>
<p>yep&#8230; it&#8217;s called ATI!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radeon HD 4000 series specifications surfaces - Page 2 - Emuforums.com</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-2858</link>
		<dc:creator>Radeon HD 4000 series specifications surfaces - Page 2 - Emuforums.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-2858</guid>
		<description>[...] of the of the 9800GTX is ~300 CND.    Well, maybe because there is a 9900gtx around the corner .  GT200 to become 9900GTX and 9900GX2, launch date set to July - Expreview.com     __________________   System Specifications: Athlon64 3200+, 1GB RAM, 8600GT 512MB, 200+250 GB [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the of the 9800GTX is ~300 CND.    Well, maybe because there is a 9900gtx around the corner .  GT200 to become 9900GTX and 9900GX2, launch date set to July &#8211; Expreview.com     __________________   System Specifications: Athlon64 3200+, 1GB RAM, 8600GT 512MB, 200+250 GB [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Master Blaster</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-2830</link>
		<dc:creator>Master Blaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-2830</guid>
		<description>WoW, Another of nVidia rechew technologies release.  8800gtx -&gt; 9800gtx -&gt; 9900gtx.  90mm -&gt; 65mm -&gt; 55mm with little improvements in feature (VP1 -&gt; VP2).  Until AtiMD come out with 4000HD and Intel with 4800HD, we will not see anything new from nVidia.  I am calling for a GENERATION (g80, g92, g94, ...etc...) BOYCOTT of nVidia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WoW, Another of nVidia rechew technologies release.  8800gtx -&gt; 9800gtx -&gt; 9900gtx.  90mm -&gt; 65mm -&gt; 55mm with little improvements in feature (VP1 -&gt; VP2).  Until AtiMD come out with 4000HD and Intel with 4800HD, we will not see anything new from nVidia.  I am calling for a GENERATION (g80, g92, g94, &#8230;etc&#8230;) BOYCOTT of nVidia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 9800gtx Hits The Egg - Page 3 - Xtreme CPU</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/317.html/comment-page-1#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>9800gtx Hits The Egg - Page 3 - Xtreme CPU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/31/gt200-to-become-9900gtx-and-9900gx2-launch-date-set-to-july/#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>[...] see this?     GT200 to become 9900GTX and 9900GX2, launch date set to July - Expreview.com  The next-gen GPU is, ironically enough, not going to be given a new name, but is rather going to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see this?     GT200 to become 9900GTX and 9900GX2, launch date set to July &#8211; Expreview.com  The next-gen GPU is, ironically enough, not going to be given a new name, but is rather going to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
