<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: G80 VS G92: Med to high end GeForce GFX cards round-up!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:57:30 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jeffnunn</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html/comment-page-1#comment-4160</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffnunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 05:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/#comment-4160</guid>
		<description>Steven,

You obviously know absolutely nothing about this. Stop lying and making shit up and google the facts quickly. You are spreading incorrect information and probably confusing people like yourself who actually did take the time to google before posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven,</p>
<p>You obviously know absolutely nothing about this. Stop lying and making shit up and google the facts quickly. You are spreading incorrect information and probably confusing people like yourself who actually did take the time to google before posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Eliuk</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html/comment-page-1#comment-3637</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Eliuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/#comment-3637</guid>
		<description>Please remember that three 9800 gtx&#039;s only produces about 1.5 teraflops of possible performance where two 9800 gx2&#039;s produce 2 teraflops of performance. So u cant really even compare the two.

Plus the possibility to add another 9800 gx2 for a total of 3Gb of frame buffer and 3 teraflops of performance.

Thats not even comparing the number of stream processors available.
 

The teraflops talk is directly correlated with the number of stream processors. Where each card has 128 stream processors, the gx2&#039;s having 256 stream processor per card, 3*256 = 768 stream processors, where the 9800 gtx (three of them) would only be 384.

Obviously there is the added cost:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please remember that three 9800 gtx&#8217;s only produces about 1.5 teraflops of possible performance where two 9800 gx2&#8217;s produce 2 teraflops of performance. So u cant really even compare the two.</p>
<p>Plus the possibility to add another 9800 gx2 for a total of 3Gb of frame buffer and 3 teraflops of performance.</p>
<p>Thats not even comparing the number of stream processors available.</p>
<p>The teraflops talk is directly correlated with the number of stream processors. Where each card has 128 stream processors, the gx2&#8217;s having 256 stream processor per card, 3*256 = 768 stream processors, where the 9800 gtx (three of them) would only be 384.</p>
<p>Obviously there is the added cost:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is this a good deal, 8800gts 640mb for 120$? - Page 3 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html/comment-page-1#comment-3400</link>
		<dc:creator>Is this a good deal, 8800gts 640mb for 120$? - Page 3 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 18:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/#comment-3400</guid>
		<description>[...] http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g...nd-up/?page=10  9600gt and the 8800gts will perform quite similarly tho 9600gt will consume much less power,but it is worth getting the 8800gt for 20-30$ more.    __________________ I believe in Karma what you give is what you get returned I believe you can&#039;t appreciate real love &#039;til you&#039;ve been burned I believe the grass is no more greener on the other side I believe you don&#039;t know what you&#039;ve got until you say goodbye [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g...nd-up/?page=10" rel="nofollow">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g&#8230;nd-up/?page=10</a>  9600gt and the 8800gts will perform quite similarly tho 9600gt will consume much less power,but it is worth getting the 8800gt for 20-30$ more.    __________________ I believe in Karma what you give is what you get returned I believe you can&#8217;t appreciate real love &#8217;til you&#8217;ve been burned I believe the grass is no more greener on the other side I believe you don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;ve got until you say goodbye [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video Card Conundrum... - StrafeRight Forums</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html/comment-page-1#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Video Card Conundrum... - StrafeRight Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>[...] the 8800GTS 320 since according to this uber-comparison, it wins in the games I play the most.  G80 VS G92: Med to high end GeForce GFX cards round-up! - Expreview.com (9)  But then there&#039;s the ol 3850/3870 cards. I don&#039;t know where they fit in to the whole equation.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the 8800GTS 320 since according to this uber-comparison, it wins in the games I play the most.  G80 VS G92: Med to high end GeForce GFX cards round-up! &#8211; Expreview.com (9)  But then there&#8217;s the ol 3850/3870 cards. I don&#8217;t know where they fit in to the whole equation.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 9600GT poco rendimiento - Pagina 7 - 3DGames</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html/comment-page-1#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>9600GT poco rendimiento - Pagina 7 - 3DGames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/#comment-2822</guid>
		<description>[...] G80 VS G92: Med to high end GeForce GFX cards round-up!  Interesante review.  __________________ Arch Linux 2008.2 &#124; CPU-Z ID 338618 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] G80 VS G92: Med to high end GeForce GFX cards round-up!  Interesante review.  __________________ Arch Linux 2008.2 | CPU-Z ID 338618 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name change: GeForce 8800GS to become GeForce 9600GSO - Expreview.com</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html/comment-page-1#comment-2809</link>
		<dc:creator>Name change: GeForce 8800GS to become GeForce 9600GSO - Expreview.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/#comment-2809</guid>
		<description>[...] The card&#8217;s performance and price are similar to 9600GT&#8217;s. (Related:  G80 VS G92, med to high end GFX cards round-up). So NV is going to change the name of GeForce 8800GS to 9600GSO, in order to Classify the card [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The card&#8217;s performance and price are similar to 9600GT&#8217;s. (Related:  G80 VS G92, med to high end GFX cards round-up). So NV is going to change the name of GeForce 8800GS to 9600GSO, in order to Classify the card [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html/comment-page-1#comment-2790</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/#comment-2790</guid>
		<description>the only reason why the g80 gts 320mb did so bad was that it was not overclocked at all. 
What a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only reason why the g80 gts 320mb did so bad was that it was not overclocked at all.<br />
What a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ratbuddy</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html/comment-page-1#comment-2782</link>
		<dc:creator>ratbuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/#comment-2782</guid>
		<description>Ajai, because it&#039;s a G80 vs G92 article, and the ATI cards really suck wind when you enable AA/AF. Even the 3870X2 can&#039;t stand up to G92 GTS. The HD3XXX series just cannot compete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajai, because it&#8217;s a G80 vs G92 article, and the ATI cards really suck wind when you enable AA/AF. Even the 3870X2 can&#8217;t stand up to G92 GTS. The HD3XXX series just cannot compete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html/comment-page-1#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/#comment-2781</guid>
		<description>I hope you will do the comparison between : 9800GTX vs 8800GTX vs 8800GTS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you will do the comparison between : 9800GTX vs 8800GTX vs 8800GTS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajai</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html/comment-page-1#comment-2775</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/#comment-2775</guid>
		<description>Why o dont you use any AMD cards scores in the table like this??? 3870 3850 anyone??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why o dont you use any AMD cards scores in the table like this??? 3870 3850 anyone??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/321.html/comment-page-1#comment-2773</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/04/02/g80-vs-g92-hi-end-geforce-gfx-cards-round-up/#comment-2773</guid>
		<description>If i were to build a monster pc right now i&#039;d much rather get three 9800 GTXs against  two GX2s, and for about the same price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i were to build a monster pc right now i&#8217;d much rather get three 9800 GTXs against  two GX2s, and for about the same price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->