<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel presents:CPU vs Graphics &amp; CPU vs RAM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: t.s</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3793</link>
		<dc:creator>t.s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3793</guid>
		<description>yeah...
don&#039;t think intel will provoked with NVIDIA taunt..
they showing their stupid-ness, aren&#039;t they?
but yes, too, the world&#039;s full of moron that will &#039;eat&#039; what intel and NVIDIA said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah&#8230;<br />
don&#8217;t think intel will provoked with NVIDIA taunt..<br />
they showing their stupid-ness, aren&#8217;t they?<br />
but yes, too, the world&#8217;s full of moron that will &#8216;eat&#8217; what intel and NVIDIA said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3779</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3779</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s just dumb how they tick GPU and CPU for games. Of course it&#039;s going to be both, but which is going to be more vital? ;)
Also with the other tests, the GPU doesn&#039;t get used, so the point is moot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s just dumb how they tick GPU and CPU for games. Of course it&#8217;s going to be both, but which is going to be more vital? <img src='http://en.expreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Also with the other tests, the GPU doesn&#8217;t get used, so the point is moot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ItalianDuo</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3753</link>
		<dc:creator>ItalianDuo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3753</guid>
		<description>STRAROTL THATS THE CRAZIEST THING I EVE SAW IN A GRAPHIC HAHAHAHAHHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STRAROTL THATS THE CRAZIEST THING I EVE SAW IN A GRAPHIC HAHAHAHAHHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Новинки и достижения IT индустрии &#124; Твердые новости &#124; Лучше процеесор интел чем память</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3743</link>
		<dc:creator>Новинки и достижения IT индустрии &#124; Твердые новости &#124; Лучше процеесор интел чем память</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3743</guid>
		<description>[...] сообщает сайт ExpReview, в последнем роадмапе компания Intel зашла в [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] сообщает сайт ExpReview, в последнем роадмапе компания Intel зашла в [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Новинки и достижения IT индустрии &#124; Твердые новости &#124; процессор интел</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3742</link>
		<dc:creator>Новинки и достижения IT индустрии &#124; Твердые новости &#124; процессор интел</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3742</guid>
		<description>[...] сообщает сайт ExpReview, в последнем роадмапе компания Intel зашла в [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] сообщает сайт ExpReview, в последнем роадмапе компания Intel зашла в [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. DD</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3732</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. DD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3732</guid>
		<description>Wow, just wow.  I just lost a lot of respect for Itel in the past 1min.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, just wow.  I just lost a lot of respect for Itel in the past 1min.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Новинки и достижения IT индустрии &#124; Твердые новости &#124; Купить новый процессор Intel разумнее, чем добавить оперативной памяти!</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3723</link>
		<dc:creator>Новинки и достижения IT индустрии &#124; Твердые новости &#124; Купить новый процессор Intel разумнее, чем добавить оперативной памяти!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3723</guid>
		<description>[...] сообщает сайт ExpReview, в последнем роадмапе компания Intel зашла в [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] сообщает сайт ExpReview, в последнем роадмапе компания Intel зашла в [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fulle</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3721</link>
		<dc:creator>Fulle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3721</guid>
		<description>Because games are the only thing that use GPU, right intel?  I guess if I fired up 3D Studio Max I&#039;d be ok with integrated graphics.... wait, no!

Who are they trying to fool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because games are the only thing that use GPU, right intel?  I guess if I fired up 3D Studio Max I&#8217;d be ok with integrated graphics&#8230;. wait, no!</p>
<p>Who are they trying to fool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEDIMASTER</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3720</link>
		<dc:creator>JEDIMASTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3720</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t buy a GPU for music, you buy it for games!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t buy a GPU for music, you buy it for games!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neromimz</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3719</link>
		<dc:creator>neromimz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3719</guid>
		<description>สำหรับข่าวนี้ ถือว่า Intel ตั้งหน้า ประจันบานพร้อมรับ AMD-nVidia เลยนะคับ
(ผมไม่ได้พิมพ์ผิดหรอก AMD-nVidia จริงๆนะ) เค้าแจงให้เห็นว่า &quot;คนส่วนใหญ่&quot; ใช้เพียง ออนบอร์ด คับ

this news is Intel ready to &quot;CPU-Graphic Fusion-Core&#039;s War&quot; [AMD-nVidia]
(that right! is AMD-nVidia)

PS. Fusion-Core Copy from AMD and AMD is take hand from nVidia Graphic , Chip
/heh! (this CPU is same same ... IBM Boardband Cell Processor 8Core+RSX!! PS3)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>สำหรับข่าวนี้ ถือว่า Intel ตั้งหน้า ประจันบานพร้อมรับ AMD-nVidia เลยนะคับ<br />
(ผมไม่ได้พิมพ์ผิดหรอก AMD-nVidia จริงๆนะ) เค้าแจงให้เห็นว่า &#8220;คนส่วนใหญ่&#8221; ใช้เพียง ออนบอร์ด คับ</p>
<p>this news is Intel ready to &#8220;CPU-Graphic Fusion-Core&#8217;s War&#8221; [AMD-nVidia]<br />
(that right! is AMD-nVidia)</p>
<p>PS. Fusion-Core Copy from AMD and AMD is take hand from nVidia Graphic , Chip<br />
/heh! (this CPU is same same &#8230; IBM Boardband Cell Processor 8Core+RSX!! PS3)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: everypot.com</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3713</link>
		<dc:creator>everypot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3713</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s stupid. Intel assume us are as stupid as they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s stupid. Intel assume us are as stupid as they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caldran</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3711</link>
		<dc:creator>caldran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3711</guid>
		<description>point less fight.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>point less fight&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwarfpower</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/451.html/comment-page-1#comment-3709</link>
		<dc:creator>dwarfpower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/10/intel-presentscpu-vs-graphics-cpu-vs-ram/#comment-3709</guid>
		<description>That is uterly stupid. they tested only applications that do not use the GPU. look at it: 3D rendering is CPU based ! it is not directX RT rendering they are talking about they ran a ray tracer, and ... surprise, more CPU mean better performances.

Music, photos, video encoding also do not use GPU, because today, only video replay on screen uses the GPU, not video encoding, at least most of the time, and i bet intel tests did not use GPU accelerated encoding.

Same trick for memory upgrade. I bet they tested with a bench software on top of a naked windows install with defender de activated. Now a vista premium defaul tinstall, with defender activated, an email client and a web browser opened for a few hour, and your HD gets hot from swapping with 1Gb and integrated graphics, but I bet they did not bench the time required to launch a fresh office session with software already running, just a benchmark software after a cold boot. in that configuration you never swap, memory upgrade can&#039;t change a thing; but I.R.L. that just never happens, and you end up with memory upgrade beeing the most sensible thing to do with the test bed proposed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is uterly stupid. they tested only applications that do not use the GPU. look at it: 3D rendering is CPU based ! it is not directX RT rendering they are talking about they ran a ray tracer, and &#8230; surprise, more CPU mean better performances.</p>
<p>Music, photos, video encoding also do not use GPU, because today, only video replay on screen uses the GPU, not video encoding, at least most of the time, and i bet intel tests did not use GPU accelerated encoding.</p>
<p>Same trick for memory upgrade. I bet they tested with a bench software on top of a naked windows install with defender de activated. Now a vista premium defaul tinstall, with defender activated, an email client and a web browser opened for a few hour, and your HD gets hot from swapping with 1Gb and integrated graphics, but I bet they did not bench the time required to launch a fresh office session with software already running, just a benchmark software after a cold boot. in that configuration you never swap, memory upgrade can&#8217;t change a thing; but I.R.L. that just never happens, and you end up with memory upgrade beeing the most sensible thing to do with the test bed proposed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
