<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Review: HD 4870 and HD 4850</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sohbet Odalari</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-26457</link>
		<dc:creator>Sohbet Odalari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-26457</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great read, i will be back for sure!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great read, i will be back for sure!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://www.thoughts.com/ciscorouter/</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-22185</link>
		<dc:creator>http://www.thoughts.com/ciscorouter/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 09:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-22185</guid>
		<description>wow,It&#039;s so nice for me,thank you for your share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow,It&#8217;s so nice for me,thank you for your share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r4dswiki</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-21590</link>
		<dc:creator>r4dswiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 02:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-21590</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing. I like this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing. I like this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louboutin sale uk</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-21049</link>
		<dc:creator>louboutin sale uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 03:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-21049</guid>
		<description>Oh and I’m running CCC 9.11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and I’m running CCC 9.11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus Striplin</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-20815</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus Striplin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-20815</guid>
		<description>Hey very nice blog!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your blog and take the feeds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey very nice blog!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your blog and take the feeds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbyeagle</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-10849</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbyeagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-10849</guid>
		<description>Oh and I&#039;m running CCC 9.11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and I&#8217;m running CCC 9.11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbyeagle</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-10848</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbyeagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-10848</guid>
		<description>I have an HIS HD4850 Turbo IceQ and CCC doesn&#039;t let you go bellow 1100 Memory clock. Any way to fix this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an HIS HD4850 Turbo IceQ and CCC doesn&#8217;t let you go bellow 1100 Memory clock. Any way to fix this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-6464</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-6464</guid>
		<description>Actually, I&#039;m looking for the equivalent of &quot;HD4850 Crossfire for Dummies&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;m looking for the equivalent of &#8220;HD4850 Crossfire for Dummies&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-6461</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-6461</guid>
		<description>I have 2 HD4850 cards in Crossfire but don&#039;t really know how to adjust the settings to best suit what works.
Where can I find instructions on how to familiarize myself with the features and optimize the settings, and when would I use OverClocking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 2 HD4850 cards in Crossfire but don&#8217;t really know how to adjust the settings to best suit what works.<br />
Where can I find instructions on how to familiarize myself with the features and optimize the settings, and when would I use OverClocking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: videoconferencing equipments</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-6066</link>
		<dc:creator>videoconferencing equipments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-6066</guid>
		<description>This is the greatest post I have come across so far.I am really pleased to post my comment on this blog .I love your blog by the way, I am gonna have to add you to my list of watched blogs .Thank you for this very useful information. stored it.Thanks again and keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the greatest post I have come across so far.I am really pleased to post my comment on this blog .I love your blog by the way, I am gonna have to add you to my list of watched blogs .Thank you for this very useful information. stored it.Thanks again and keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMD RV775 Ready to Give Nvidia a Punch - Expreview.com</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-6028</link>
		<dc:creator>AMD RV775 Ready to Give Nvidia a Punch - Expreview.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-6028</guid>
		<description>[...] Perhaps you&#8217;d be interested in reading the first review: HD 4870 and HD 4850  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Perhaps you&#8217;d be interested in reading the first review: HD 4870 and HD 4850  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeForce 9800 GX2, HD 3870X2, GeForce 9600GT, GeForce 9800GTX, GeForce 9800GTS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AMD Radeon HD 4870, AMD Radeon HD 4850 Review Roundup</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-5234</link>
		<dc:creator>GeForce 9800 GX2, HD 3870X2, GeForce 9600GT, GeForce 9800GTX, GeForce 9800GTS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AMD Radeon HD 4870, AMD Radeon HD 4850 Review Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-5234</guid>
		<description>[...] 6. Hardware Canucks 7. HotHardware 8. Rage3D 9. Computerbase (Deutsch) 10. Arstechnica 11. Expreview 12. Hardocp 13. TweakTown 14. Bjorn3D 15. PCPerspective 16. LegitReviews 17. FiringSquad 18. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6. Hardware Canucks 7. HotHardware 8. Rage3D 9. Computerbase (Deutsch) 10. Arstechnica 11. Expreview 12. Hardocp 13. TweakTown 14. Bjorn3D 15. PCPerspective 16. LegitReviews 17. FiringSquad 18. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yot</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-4654</link>
		<dc:creator>yot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-4654</guid>
		<description>This review is so old</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This review is so old</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shinobi</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-4636</link>
		<dc:creator>Shinobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-4636</guid>
		<description>You complain about the AMD card reaching 100c like no Nvidia has ever done that before.

8800GTS 640 &gt; ~130c benched in my very own rig.. (using furmark)

Fourth card to go back for RMA at the eleventh month, Nvidia just can&#039;t make cards that won&#039;t burn up.. 66gt, 78gt, 79gt, 88gts.. They all stopped working after about a year.

Some with after market coolers that dropped temps in half, still die like flies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You complain about the AMD card reaching 100c like no Nvidia has ever done that before.</p>
<p>8800GTS 640 &gt; ~130c benched in my very own rig.. (using furmark)</p>
<p>Fourth card to go back for RMA at the eleventh month, Nvidia just can&#8217;t make cards that won&#8217;t burn up.. 66gt, 78gt, 79gt, 88gts.. They all stopped working after about a year.</p>
<p>Some with after market coolers that dropped temps in half, still die like flies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aramint</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-4210</link>
		<dc:creator>Aramint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-4210</guid>
		<description>Correct on that one Jeff, PCIe 1.1 and 2.0 was found to have no differences.  Tom&#039;s Hardware did a comprehensive test in this regards a while back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct on that one Jeff, PCIe 1.1 and 2.0 was found to have no differences.  Tom&#8217;s Hardware did a comprehensive test in this regards a while back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-4209</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-4209</guid>
		<description>PCIe 1.1 x16 = 4GB/s
PCIe 2.0 x16 = 8GB/s

bottleneck issue will depend on games/applications...personally i think it is ok for current games</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PCIe 1.1 x16 = 4GB/s<br />
PCIe 2.0 x16 = 8GB/s</p>
<p>bottleneck issue will depend on games/applications&#8230;personally i think it is ok for current games</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-4207</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-4207</guid>
		<description>Ok, what I wanna know, is if E6550, OCed to 3.0Ghz will bottleneck HD4870, and, if is there going to be any differences between the PCI-E 1.1 and 2.0 motherboards? If there&#039;ll be, how big will it be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, what I wanna know, is if E6550, OCed to 3.0Ghz will bottleneck HD4870, and, if is there going to be any differences between the PCI-E 1.1 and 2.0 motherboards? If there&#8217;ll be, how big will it be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GTX 260 and HD 4870 drop to the same price, Which one to buy? - Expreview.com</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/480.html/comment-page-2#comment-4162</link>
		<dc:creator>GTX 260 and HD 4870 drop to the same price, Which one to buy? - Expreview.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/06/24/first-review-hd-4870-and-hd-4850/#comment-4162</guid>
		<description>[...] 4870. As of July 4th, GTX 260 has dropped to the same price as HD 4870. In fact, we found GTX 260 almost the same as HD 4870 in performance, but GTX 260 has advantages in NVIDIA&#8217;s drivers and industry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4870. As of July 4th, GTX 260 has dropped to the same price as HD 4870. In fact, we found GTX 260 almost the same as HD 4870 in performance, but GTX 260 has advantages in NVIDIA&#8217;s drivers and industry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
