<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New? Old? three ways of GTX 260 Discriminations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/10/new-old-three-ways-of-gtx-260-discriminations/884.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/10/new-old-three-ways-of-gtx-260-discriminations/884.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/10/new-old-three-ways-of-gtx-260-discriminations/884.html/comment-page-1#comment-5260</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=884#comment-5260</guid>
		<description>@x1reme

He has specified that it had to be nvidia, that&#039;s why I said wait. Else I would have said go ATi now.
Besides, R800 isn&#039;t actually a massive performance increase like R700 was. I think that was reported here, maybe not, but yeah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@x1reme</p>
<p>He has specified that it had to be nvidia, that&#8217;s why I said wait. Else I would have said go ATi now.<br />
Besides, R800 isn&#8217;t actually a massive performance increase like R700 was. I think that was reported here, maybe not, but yeah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: name</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/10/new-old-three-ways-of-gtx-260-discriminations/884.html/comment-page-1#comment-5255</link>
		<dc:creator>name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=884#comment-5255</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a great card anyway, go for it sonk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a great card anyway, go for it sonk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: x1reme</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/10/new-old-three-ways-of-gtx-260-discriminations/884.html/comment-page-1#comment-5226</link>
		<dc:creator>x1reme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=884#comment-5226</guid>
		<description>How will it be cheaper fools when clearly more stuff is added but on the same 65nm. 

&quot;Wait until the 55/40nm cards come out in Q1 2009.&quot; and what then? well amd is gonna come with The R800 series, so any plans nvidia has is of no use. Old Technology Vs new Technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How will it be cheaper fools when clearly more stuff is added but on the same 65nm. </p>
<p>&#8220;Wait until the 55/40nm cards come out in Q1 2009.&#8221; and what then? well amd is gonna come with The R800 series, so any plans nvidia has is of no use. Old Technology Vs new Technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonk</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/10/new-old-three-ways-of-gtx-260-discriminations/884.html/comment-page-1#comment-5218</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=884#comment-5218</guid>
		<description>Well, i need something this year(and its gotta be Nvidia). So if the new 216SP GTX260 is slightly cheaper, or its introduction will cause a price reduction in the older model..then i&#039;ll wait and see, September 16 isn&#039;t far off...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i need something this year(and its gotta be Nvidia). So if the new 216SP GTX260 is slightly cheaper, or its introduction will cause a price reduction in the older model..then i&#8217;ll wait and see, September 16 isn&#8217;t far off&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/10/new-old-three-ways-of-gtx-260-discriminations/884.html/comment-page-1#comment-5217</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=884#comment-5217</guid>
		<description>Wait until the 55/40nm cards come out in Q1 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait until the 55/40nm cards come out in Q1 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonk</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/10/new-old-three-ways-of-gtx-260-discriminations/884.html/comment-page-1#comment-5215</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=884#comment-5215</guid>
		<description>thanks. So its still 65 nm. Any idea what the price will be, will it be cheaper or more expensive than the current GTX 260? I&#039;m planning on building a new computer soon, maybe i should wait?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks. So its still 65 nm. Any idea what the price will be, will it be cheaper or more expensive than the current GTX 260? I&#8217;m planning on building a new computer soon, maybe i should wait?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babyfish</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/10/new-old-three-ways-of-gtx-260-discriminations/884.html/comment-page-1#comment-5213</link>
		<dc:creator>Babyfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=884#comment-5213</guid>
		<description>Intelligent way, very practical also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intelligent way, very practical also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/10/new-old-three-ways-of-gtx-260-discriminations/884.html/comment-page-1#comment-5205</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=884#comment-5205</guid>
		<description>it is a 65nm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is a 65nm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonk</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/10/new-old-three-ways-of-gtx-260-discriminations/884.html/comment-page-1#comment-5204</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=884#comment-5204</guid>
		<description>Are the new 216SP GTX 260 using 55nm process?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the new 216SP GTX 260 using 55nm process?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
