<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GeForce GTX380 and GTX360 Benchmarks Surface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: no</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-10480</link>
		<dc:creator>no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-10480</guid>
		<description>Oh what, fermi even cures cough now? Damn I gotta start saving up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh what, fermi even cures cough now? Damn I gotta start saving up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9947</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9947</guid>
		<description>This has to be fake...

9800 GX2 performance was almost equal to the GTX 280. In fact in some games the GX2 came on top and in others wise versa.

Also something to keep in mind is the stream processor clusters. I.e. the HD5970 has 3200 ATI Stream processors, which, as inacurate as this may be is somewhere close to 800 Nvidia stream processors or at the least 640. 

How can 512 NV stream processors out perform 640 -800 by such as huge margin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has to be fake&#8230;</p>
<p>9800 GX2 performance was almost equal to the GTX 280. In fact in some games the GX2 came on top and in others wise versa.</p>
<p>Also something to keep in mind is the stream processor clusters. I.e. the HD5970 has 3200 ATI Stream processors, which, as inacurate as this may be is somewhere close to 800 Nvidia stream processors or at the least 640. </p>
<p>How can 512 NV stream processors out perform 640 -800 by such as huge margin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9793</link>
		<dc:creator>no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9793</guid>
		<description>Sure, the 450 watt &quot;gtx380x2&quot; will be a HUGE success when it comes out in 2012</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, the 450 watt &#8220;gtx380x2&#8243; will be a HUGE success when it comes out in 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadIrish</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9791</link>
		<dc:creator>MadIrish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 07:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9791</guid>
		<description>You do realize that the 5970 is a dual gpu card(5850X2)(costs $700)and if those benchies are true then ATI is in trouble because Nvidia has a dual gtx380X2 in the works(probably called the gtx395 not sure).If those are real that means that two of ATI&#039;s most powerful gpu&#039;s are losing to single Nvidia fermi.And if a single beats ATI&#039;s best dual imagine what the dual GPU fermi&#039;s will do ouch.I personally dont think these are accurate Benchies, however I do think the actual results will be similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do realize that the 5970 is a dual gpu card(5850X2)(costs $700)and if those benchies are true then ATI is in trouble because Nvidia has a dual gtx380X2 in the works(probably called the gtx395 not sure).If those are real that means that two of ATI&#8217;s most powerful gpu&#8217;s are losing to single Nvidia fermi.And if a single beats ATI&#8217;s best dual imagine what the dual GPU fermi&#8217;s will do ouch.I personally dont think these are accurate Benchies, however I do think the actual results will be similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkman</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9777</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9777</guid>
		<description>Looks like Nvidia is in trouble if those benchmarks where true. Why?
Simple... By the time Nvidia releases the GTX380, ATi would have
lowered the prices of their 5000 series, which means trouble for Nvidia.
Since the 5970 is just an inch behind in terms of performance and prices are
lowered by that time, Nvidia is in deep shit. And besides, how many gamers
do you think run games on a 1920X1200, that comprises the market?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Nvidia is in trouble if those benchmarks where true. Why?<br />
Simple&#8230; By the time Nvidia releases the GTX380, ATi would have<br />
lowered the prices of their 5000 series, which means trouble for Nvidia.<br />
Since the 5970 is just an inch behind in terms of performance and prices are<br />
lowered by that time, Nvidia is in deep shit. And besides, how many gamers<br />
do you think run games on a 1920X1200, that comprises the market?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skippy</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9556</link>
		<dc:creator>Skippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9556</guid>
		<description>why so negative everyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why so negative everyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aramid</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9553</link>
		<dc:creator>Aramid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9553</guid>
		<description>The Crysis benchmark is here:

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18089093

There is a typo with the resolution, it says 1900x1200 instead of 1920x1200 like every other test (*cough FAKE cough cough).  Maybe that is why no one is showing the Crysis benchmark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Crysis benchmark is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18089093" rel="nofollow">http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18089093</a></p>
<p>There is a typo with the resolution, it says 1900&#215;1200 instead of 1920&#215;1200 like every other test (*cough FAKE cough cough).  Maybe that is why no one is showing the Crysis benchmark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9552</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9552</guid>
		<description>yep it&#039;s publicity stunt by Nvidia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep it&#8217;s publicity stunt by Nvidia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9548</link>
		<dc:creator>no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9548</guid>
		<description>no directx 11 benchmark? HAHAHAHAHAH oh that slaps me on the knee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no directx 11 benchmark? HAHAHAHAHAH oh that slaps me on the knee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hok</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9547</link>
		<dc:creator>Hok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9547</guid>
		<description>It is proven by the time that the next generation flagship card is a bit faster than the ex flagship in dual GPU (CF or SLI). I just hope that the price is just the same with the one they replace (GTX 360 should price same as GTX 260 with the performance a bit faster than GTX 260 in SLI). And the replaced GPU will be priced lower :). Let hope for the best :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is proven by the time that the next generation flagship card is a bit faster than the ex flagship in dual GPU (CF or SLI). I just hope that the price is just the same with the one they replace (GTX 360 should price same as GTX 260 with the performance a bit faster than GTX 260 in SLI). And the replaced GPU will be priced lower <img src='http://en.expreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Let hope for the best <img src='http://en.expreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ollum</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9546</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9546</guid>
		<description>Hmm looks like bullshit to me. Going from GTX 285 to GTX 380 you get more than 100% more performace, right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm looks like bullshit to me. Going from GTX 285 to GTX 380 you get more than 100% more performace, right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aramid</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9544</link>
		<dc:creator>Aramid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9544</guid>
		<description>Of course these photos are fake, the 5970 gets around 33 more FPS than a 295 in STALKER DX10 and no difference between GTX 295 and a 5870 at 1920*1200.  For Far Cry 2 at the same resolution, a 5870 gets 10 FPS more than an overclocked GTX 295...  These fake photos are nothing more than a tickle on the anus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course these photos are fake, the 5970 gets around 33 more FPS than a 295 in STALKER DX10 and no difference between GTX 295 and a 5870 at 1920*1200.  For Far Cry 2 at the same resolution, a 5870 gets 10 FPS more than an overclocked GTX 295&#8230;  These fake photos are nothing more than a tickle on the anus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Małysz</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9543</link>
		<dc:creator>Małysz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 07:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9543</guid>
		<description>Face this: http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=21212&amp;page=7 Far Cry 2, same resolution, same AA, and 5970 125FPS (77FPS here) vs 80FPS (67FPS here) @t GTX 295.  

I wonder how it will perform under DX11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face this: <a href="http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=21212&#038;page=7" rel="nofollow">http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=21212&#038;page=7</a> Far Cry 2, same resolution, same AA, and 5970 125FPS (77FPS here) vs 80FPS (67FPS here) @t GTX 295.  </p>
<p>I wonder how it will perform under DX11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inf3rno</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9541</link>
		<dc:creator>inf3rno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 06:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9541</guid>
		<description>Q1 2010, till then ATI ll fill its pockets. And when the fermi is out ATI ll cut their prices in response. Then their would be clash of prices not titans, because I don&#039;t expect GTX360 less then 350$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q1 2010, till then ATI ll fill its pockets. And when the fermi is out ATI ll cut their prices in response. Then their would be clash of prices not titans, because I don&#8217;t expect GTX360 less then 350$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FuNGuS</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9540</link>
		<dc:creator>FuNGuS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9540</guid>
		<description>the green fanbois are still quite since the proof is not yet on their hands.

this will be exciting once fermi is out. this is gonna be a clash of the titans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the green fanbois are still quite since the proof is not yet on their hands.</p>
<p>this will be exciting once fermi is out. this is gonna be a clash of the titans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polak</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2009/12/14/geforce-gtx380-and-gtx360-benchmarks-surface/6084.html/comment-page-1#comment-9538</link>
		<dc:creator>Polak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6084#comment-9538</guid>
		<description>ATI will releasing overclocked version of Radeon HD5970 named as Radeon HD5990.
We already easily overclock HD5970 by 20% :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ATI will releasing overclocked version of Radeon HD5970 named as Radeon HD5990.<br />
We already easily overclock HD5970 by 20% <img src='http://en.expreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
