NVIDIA CEO Showcases Fermi-based Tesla Graphics Card
NVIDIA’s co-founder and CEO Jen-Hsun Huang has recently showcased the final version of their Fermi-based Tesla graphics card in Japan, according to PC.Watch website.
Maybe you still remember the fake Fermi-based Tesla card at GTC 2009, but this time it’s real. The Tesla series will be powered by 448 stream processors, compared to the 512 ones found on GF100 which targets consumer market. This may help to bring down the power consumption and heat.
February 1st, 2010 at 5:34 pm
So, for gaming its ati?
February 1st, 2010 at 6:19 pm
Yes if u are poor.
February 1st, 2010 at 6:56 pm
“Yes if u are poor.” ¬¬
let’s see what Nvidia will have to offer, i don’t think they will beat ATI so easy
February 1st, 2010 at 7:51 pm
nvidia did beat ATI so easy with G80.
and I think they will with GF100.
February 1st, 2010 at 8:36 pm
@ATIsucksballs: not everyone is a multi-millionaire. Anyway, perhaps this card will beat ATI’s HD5870 and perhaps even the HD5890. However, those cards are in contrary to the GF100 cheap. Though I do not know the price of the GF100, the card surely will be priced extremely high because of the failing yields at TSMC. All those costs will be accounted for in the final productprice of the GF100.
February 1st, 2010 at 10:24 pm
Why do some dudes think, that ATI cant pull anything from its sleev?
The higher nvidia pushes the upcoming fermis price tag, the easier it should be for ATI to put something together, imo.
February 1st, 2010 at 10:38 pm
It’s going to be GTX 280 vs. Radeon 4870 again, except a bigger gap this time… the nV solution will be far quicker and have better drivers overall in terms of game glitches not being present like ATI has constantly, but ATI’s will be cheaper (and correspondingly slower). You don’t have to be a multi-millionaire to afford a $500-600 graphics card: stop blowing $20 bills on drinks at the club every night and you’ll be fine, friends.
February 1st, 2010 at 10:58 pm
According to slide #10 each Fermi costs $1300. I definitely won’t be getting one lol
February 1st, 2010 at 11:13 pm
Yes, you don’t have to be a multi-millionaire to buy overpriced €500-600 Fermi, you just have to be stupid. You don’t have to be a multi-billionaire to buy Intel Extreme CPUs, you just have to be retard. Food, clothes, friends, parties, who cares. Just buy Fermi and Intel Extreme CPU, run benchmarks all day long.
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:02 am
hahahahaha word
February 2nd, 2010 at 2:10 am
@jason
Thats the tesla variant you idiot
February 2nd, 2010 at 3:36 am
I dont get why everyone thinks ATI sucks. Ati right now is leading the gaming industry while Nvidia is dragging their butts. lets see what nvidia has to offer I also refuse to pay a crapload of cash for a single gpu card
February 2nd, 2010 at 3:52 am
“It’s going to be GTX 280 vs. Radeon 4870 again, except a bigger gap this time… the nV solution will be far quicker and have better drivers overall in terms of game glitches not being present like ATI has constantly, but ATI’s will be cheaper (and correspondingly slower). You don’t have to be a multi-millionaire to afford a $500-600 graphics card: stop blowing $20 bills on drinks at the club every night and you’ll be fine, friends.”
Dude, so you are saying we should buy a $600 video card so that we can be losers and hang in our room all day playing lamer console ports? There is nothing more 3d than drinks at the club every night, lol. Get a clue, and fat girls need loving too.
February 2nd, 2010 at 3:27 pm
I often hear complaining that new Radeon’s are such expensive xD
February 2nd, 2010 at 5:42 pm
@Atisucksballs. you forgot to mention stupid also.
February 2nd, 2010 at 9:48 pm
NV solution will be far quicker? Less glitches? How would you or anyone know?
Innovative technology and groundbreaking new architecture NV keeps talking about those, but such big words may mean nothing when it comes down to actual usability and actual performance of the product we could have all learned that much by now.
NV has been most consistent with avoiding ANY kind of real performance test being taken on Fermi. Demos and talk is all they have offered so far, that and now a soon to be 6 month lag behind ATI in terms of next gen release.
I have no reason to assume the fermi will not beat the 5800 nor do I to assume that it will. However since it won’t be based on a native DX11 API I am most curious to see how it will cope when it comes to DX11 performance. And DX11 is a very promising stride in game development technology which I believe will be far more crucial than physx.
February 3rd, 2010 at 1:11 pm
W think that this is a future technology, and now I only need very powerful GPU with DX11. Grounbreaking new architecture is useless in this year