<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel to Offer Affordable Processors With Unlocked Multipliers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/04/intel-to-offer-affordable-processors-with-unlocked-multipliers/6833.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/04/intel-to-offer-affordable-processors-with-unlocked-multipliers/6833.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NOS</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/04/intel-to-offer-affordable-processors-with-unlocked-multipliers/6833.html/comment-page-1#comment-10410</link>
		<dc:creator>NOS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/04/intel-to-offer-affordable-processors-with-unlocked-multipliers/6833.html#comment-10410</guid>
		<description>HAHA !

So AMD forced intel to make affordable processors with unlocked multipliers !

AMD rocks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA !</p>
<p>So AMD forced intel to make affordable processors with unlocked multipliers !</p>
<p>AMD rocks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lehpron</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/04/intel-to-offer-affordable-processors-with-unlocked-multipliers/6833.html/comment-page-1#comment-10406</link>
		<dc:creator>lehpron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 10:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/04/intel-to-offer-affordable-processors-with-unlocked-multipliers/6833.html#comment-10406</guid>
		<description>Only someone used to spending $1k would see an MSRP of $600 as affordable.

Consider Intel&#039;s experimental sales run in China of a Pentium E6500K with an unlocked multi was available no where near the dollar equivalent of $600.  It was basically a crippled 45nm Core 2 Duo, just enough so E8000 sales were cut into.  So only frequency junkies were interested.

That would be the only way Intel could sell such CPUs and make a buck, and not cut into sales of higher priced non-unlocked CPUs, if something like their Clarkdale-based Pentium G6950 or Core i3&#039;s were unlocked.  Most defintely an i7 in s1156 will not get unlocked, as it would cut into s1366 sales since that&#039;s where the only unlocked CPUs are showing up.

Keep in mind, it is AMD&#039;s cheaper dual/tri-core black editions that are forcing Intel&#039;s hand, which are all less than $300.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only someone used to spending $1k would see an MSRP of $600 as affordable.</p>
<p>Consider Intel&#8217;s experimental sales run in China of a Pentium E6500K with an unlocked multi was available no where near the dollar equivalent of $600.  It was basically a crippled 45nm Core 2 Duo, just enough so E8000 sales were cut into.  So only frequency junkies were interested.</p>
<p>That would be the only way Intel could sell such CPUs and make a buck, and not cut into sales of higher priced non-unlocked CPUs, if something like their Clarkdale-based Pentium G6950 or Core i3&#8242;s were unlocked.  Most defintely an i7 in s1156 will not get unlocked, as it would cut into s1366 sales since that&#8217;s where the only unlocked CPUs are showing up.</p>
<p>Keep in mind, it is AMD&#8217;s cheaper dual/tri-core black editions that are forcing Intel&#8217;s hand, which are all less than $300.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/04/intel-to-offer-affordable-processors-with-unlocked-multipliers/6833.html/comment-page-1#comment-10405</link>
		<dc:creator>MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/04/intel-to-offer-affordable-processors-with-unlocked-multipliers/6833.html#comment-10405</guid>
		<description>I imagine it&#039;ll be a Core i7-870 with an unlocked multiplier for $599.99 MSRP.  I&#039;m going to assume it will compete with Thuban Black Edition for the people whom love pumping volts through CPUs that are 2-3 times what average joe overclocker would pay and 1/2 what crazy extremist would pay.  Interesting niche.

870 has a 22x (23x turbo) stock multiplier.  This begs the question, does anyone other than an extreme overclocker, likely to be on S1366, really need greater than a 23x multiplier?  Lynnfield doesn&#039;t seem to love much over 4ghz without high volts/power consumption, and this can be obtained through a reasonable base clock overclock on a decent motherboard with an 860, which is half the price.

I guess that would be the catch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine it&#8217;ll be a Core i7-870 with an unlocked multiplier for $599.99 MSRP.  I&#8217;m going to assume it will compete with Thuban Black Edition for the people whom love pumping volts through CPUs that are 2-3 times what average joe overclocker would pay and 1/2 what crazy extremist would pay.  Interesting niche.</p>
<p>870 has a 22x (23x turbo) stock multiplier.  This begs the question, does anyone other than an extreme overclocker, likely to be on S1366, really need greater than a 23x multiplier?  Lynnfield doesn&#8217;t seem to love much over 4ghz without high volts/power consumption, and this can be obtained through a reasonable base clock overclock on a decent motherboard with an 860, which is half the price.</p>
<p>I guess that would be the catch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/04/intel-to-offer-affordable-processors-with-unlocked-multipliers/6833.html/comment-page-1#comment-10393</link>
		<dc:creator>no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/04/intel-to-offer-affordable-processors-with-unlocked-multipliers/6833.html#comment-10393</guid>
		<description>come on, where&#039;s the catch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>come on, where&#8217;s the catch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
