<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD&#8217;s Ontario Computing Performance Leaked Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/2010/07/29/amds-ontario-computing-performance-leaked-out/8694.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/07/29/amds-ontario-computing-performance-leaked-out/8694.html</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorry</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/07/29/amds-ontario-computing-performance-leaked-out/8694.html/comment-page-1#comment-11542</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=8694#comment-11542</guid>
		<description>but I think this fusion is rubbish. Why did it take so many years just to stick GPU and CPU on one piece of silicon. While AMD has access to both CPU and GPU architecture I was expecting more like AMDs version of CUDA + CPU hybrid thing. Optimized GPU is clearly faster than CPU, what can I say, AMD is one stupid idiotic company. Multicore is also BS, in future the game developers might just quit messing around with those stupid threads because it is easier to make the whole game run on GPU than make it 16&lt; threaded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but I think this fusion is rubbish. Why did it take so many years just to stick GPU and CPU on one piece of silicon. While AMD has access to both CPU and GPU architecture I was expecting more like AMDs version of CUDA + CPU hybrid thing. Optimized GPU is clearly faster than CPU, what can I say, AMD is one stupid idiotic company. Multicore is also BS, in future the game developers might just quit messing around with those stupid threads because it is easier to make the whole game run on GPU than make it 16&lt; threaded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/07/29/amds-ontario-computing-performance-leaked-out/8694.html/comment-page-1#comment-11512</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=8694#comment-11512</guid>
		<description>http://citavia.blog.de/2010/06/29/llano-tri-core-and-ontario-dual-core-spotted-8884456/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://citavia.blog.de/2010/06/29/llano-tri-core-and-ontario-dual-core-spotted-8884456/" rel="nofollow">http://citavia.blog.de/2010/06/29/llano-tri-core-and-ontario-dual-core-spotted-8884456/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynamic</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/07/29/amds-ontario-computing-performance-leaked-out/8694.html/comment-page-1#comment-11467</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynamic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=8694#comment-11467</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you notice the &quot;BOINC Distributed Computing&quot;? It is the link of the source. But anyway, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you notice the &#8220;BOINC Distributed Computing&#8221;? It is the link of the source. But anyway, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/07/29/amds-ontario-computing-performance-leaked-out/8694.html/comment-page-1#comment-11440</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=8694#comment-11440</guid>
		<description>The source is:

http://www.hardware-infos.com/news.php?news=3644</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The source is:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hardware-infos.com/news.php?news=3644" rel="nofollow">http://www.hardware-infos.com/news.php?news=3644</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
