<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:16:18 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Official: Next-Generation 3DMark is DirectX 11 Only by Monstru</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/16/official-next-generation-3dmark-is-directx-11-only/6870.html/comment-page-1#comment-10519</link>
		<dc:creator>Monstru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6870#comment-10519</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately I think there will be a while untill we will se the first DX11 benchmark from Futuremark. I would be very happy to see a new 3DMark launched before 2010 is over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately I think there will be a while untill we will se the first DX11 benchmark from Futuremark. I would be very happy to see a new 3DMark launched before 2010 is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NV shrinks 9600GT to 55nm without changing the name by Stephen</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/07/28/nv-shrinks-9600gt-to-55nm-without-changing-the-name/585.html/comment-page-1#comment-10518</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2008/07/28/nv-shrinks-9600gt-to-55nm-without-changing-the-name/#comment-10518</guid>
		<description>Cool and wicked points, I love it!.. Great blog and bets are I&#039;ll be back here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool and wicked points, I love it!.. Great blog and bets are I&#8217;ll be back here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GeForce GTX470 and GTX480 Specs &amp; Pictures Emerge by kabex</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/19/geforce-gtx470-and-gtx480-specs-pictures-emerge/6891.html/comment-page-1#comment-10517</link>
		<dc:creator>kabex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/19/geforce-gtx470-and-gtx480-specs-pictures-emerge/6891.html#comment-10517</guid>
		<description>GTX 480 will have 480 SP:s and have a TDP of 250W. The posted specs are for a later version, perhaps a GTX 485.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GTX 480 will have 480 SP:s and have a TDP of 250W. The posted specs are for a later version, perhaps a GTX 485.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Preview: Galaxy Dual-core GTS250 graphics retail version by no</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/10/galaxy-dual-core-gts250-retail-version/6851.html/comment-page-1#comment-10516</link>
		<dc:creator>no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6851#comment-10516</guid>
		<description>you really think 3000 cards is a big piece of the market</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you really think 3000 cards is a big piece of the market</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thermaltake Initiates &#8220;Be Our Valentine&#8221; Event by MeanBruce</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/02/03/thermaltake-initiates-be-our-valentine-event/6633.html/comment-page-1#comment-10515</link>
		<dc:creator>MeanBruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6633#comment-10515</guid>
		<description>Hey Crystal! How you doin&#039;? Did I tell you my name is Bruce?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Crystal! How you doin&#8217;? Did I tell you my name is Bruce?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thermaltake Initiates &#8220;Be Our Valentine&#8221; Event by Crystal</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/02/03/thermaltake-initiates-be-our-valentine-event/6633.html/comment-page-1#comment-10514</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6633#comment-10514</guid>
		<description>I enjoy getting dressed as a Barbie doll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy getting dressed as a Barbie doll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GeForce GTX470 and GTX480 Specs &amp; Pictures Emerge by Jon</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/19/geforce-gtx470-and-gtx480-specs-pictures-emerge/6891.html/comment-page-1#comment-10513</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/19/geforce-gtx470-and-gtx480-specs-pictures-emerge/6891.html#comment-10513</guid>
		<description>Well, the good news is that the GTX480 is no longer than the 5870 or 5970...

The bad news? I was correct about making your case feeling like a mini-volcano inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the good news is that the GTX480 is no longer than the 5870 or 5970&#8230;</p>
<p>The bad news? I was correct about making your case feeling like a mini-volcano inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Preview: Galaxy Dual-core GTS250 graphics retail version by Some Guy</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/10/galaxy-dual-core-gts250-retail-version/6851.html/comment-page-1#comment-10512</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6851#comment-10512</guid>
		<description>How much do you think is the percentage of hardcore folders out of all the people who buy graphic cards, really?



Really?  Huge..  Have a look here:

http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_list.php?s=

Look at the first 10 teams or so.  The majority if points at the moment are being generated by nVidia graphics cards.  A 9800GX2 is good for about 10,000 points per day folding on both cores.  A GTX275 is worth about 8,000 points per day.

That first 10 teams are doing about 30 MILLION points per day.  If only half of that is coming from graphics cards, that&#039;s a crap load of cards...  

I am quite serious when I say, if galaxy build this card and sell it at a decent price, folders will flock to it.  Especially when you consider it&#039;s pretty much impossible to buy anything better then a GTX260 at the moment.  Anywhere that has stock of a higher card only has it because they&#039;re charging so much nobody is willing to pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much do you think is the percentage of hardcore folders out of all the people who buy graphic cards, really?</p>
<p>Really?  Huge..  Have a look here:</p>
<p><a href="http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_list.php?s=" rel="nofollow">http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_list.php?s=</a></p>
<p>Look at the first 10 teams or so.  The majority if points at the moment are being generated by nVidia graphics cards.  A 9800GX2 is good for about 10,000 points per day folding on both cores.  A GTX275 is worth about 8,000 points per day.</p>
<p>That first 10 teams are doing about 30 MILLION points per day.  If only half of that is coming from graphics cards, that&#8217;s a crap load of cards&#8230;  </p>
<p>I am quite serious when I say, if galaxy build this card and sell it at a decent price, folders will flock to it.  Especially when you consider it&#8217;s pretty much impossible to buy anything better then a GTX260 at the moment.  Anywhere that has stock of a higher card only has it because they&#8217;re charging so much nobody is willing to pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GeForce GTX470 and GTX480 Specs &amp; Pictures Emerge by no</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/19/geforce-gtx470-and-gtx480-specs-pictures-emerge/6891.html/comment-page-1#comment-10511</link>
		<dc:creator>no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/19/geforce-gtx470-and-gtx480-specs-pictures-emerge/6891.html#comment-10511</guid>
		<description>ITS A SPACESHIP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITS A SPACESHIP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hardware Requirements on Windows 7 XP Mode Removed by no</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/19/hardware-requirements-on-windows-7-xp-mode-removed/6893.html/comment-page-1#comment-10510</link>
		<dc:creator>no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/19/hardware-requirements-on-windows-7-xp-mode-removed/6893.html#comment-10510</guid>
		<description>gonna be soooo slow without vtt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gonna be soooo slow without vtt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Preview: Galaxy Dual-core GTS250 graphics retail version by no</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/10/galaxy-dual-core-gts250-retail-version/6851.html/comment-page-1#comment-10509</link>
		<dc:creator>no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6851#comment-10509</guid>
		<description>How much do you think is the percentage of hardcore folders out of all the people who buy graphic cards, really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much do you think is the percentage of hardcore folders out of all the people who buy graphic cards, really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Upcoming GeForce GTX480 OC Edition to Draw 305W of Power by I0Mega</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/15/the-upcoming-geforce-gtx480-oc-edition-to-draw-305w-of-power/6866.html/comment-page-1#comment-10508</link>
		<dc:creator>I0Mega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6866#comment-10508</guid>
		<description>I laugh at the idiots who wants to buy 3 of these things and stuff them in their computer boxes just for gaming or to show how big their e-peen is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I laugh at the idiots who wants to buy 3 of these things and stuff them in their computer boxes just for gaming or to show how big their e-peen is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Preview: Galaxy Dual-core GTS250 graphics retail version by Some Guy</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/10/galaxy-dual-core-gts250-retail-version/6851.html/comment-page-1#comment-10507</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6851#comment-10507</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not really concerned about the cards gaming abilities, and neither should galaxy.  If they make this card, Folders will buy it, and providing it doesn&#039;t explode, they&#039;ll buy a lot of them.

http://folding.stanford.edu/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really concerned about the cards gaming abilities, and neither should galaxy.  If they make this card, Folders will buy it, and providing it doesn&#8217;t explode, they&#8217;ll buy a lot of them.</p>
<p><a href="http://folding.stanford.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://folding.stanford.edu/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ATI Catalyst 10.3 Preview Drivers Released by Turtle</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/18/ati-catalyst-10-3-preview-drivers-released/6887.html/comment-page-1#comment-10505</link>
		<dc:creator>Turtle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6887#comment-10505</guid>
		<description>I agree with some of that. :)

I think AMD will price-match 480/470 with 5890/5870.  The 5850 will sit in some weird limbo because as the best value it can; until G104 is released.  Then the two will spar.  That would be AMD drinking nVIDIA&#039;s milkshake, as it were.  Come 28nm though at the end of this year or beginning of the next, both will likely be equals again; competitive in each segment. 

As for CPUs, I actually have faith in AMDs plans.  I think the setup, which is Llano (Fusion) versus dual-core Sandy Bridge and Zambezi (&#039;4/8-core&#039; Bulldozer) above and below quad-core SB, will certainly spur Intel to get Haswell together on the GPU front.  It&#039;s too late for Ivy Bridge as we already know that will be essentially a quad-core Intel CPU against a Bulldozer with 2nd-gen Fusion for the mid-range and 6-8 (or what AMD would call 12-16) at the higher-end.  Did I mention a half-Llano &#039;Bobcat&#039; for laptops on 28nm in 2011?  Yes, there will be competition in CPUs.

Concerning SSDs, there&#039;s not a lot to be happy about at the moment, for which I agree, but the ~$100 boot drives (32/40GB) are a good start.  Given the upcoming NAND shrinks from not only Intel, but the other suppliers, not-to-mention the new controllers like Sandforce, I think a year from now there will be not only good value on the low-end, but in-turn speed improvement and price-wars on the higher-end; bringing the tech as a whole one step closer to the mainstream.  I Don&#039;t expect true acceptance until the next-gen after that, but still, improvement and competition which is the point.  

In short:  Yes, 2010 kind of sucks from a consumer value and competition standpoint.  But 2011 will bring good value and innovation as companies dabble in 32nm and smaller (28/25nm) process tech and products become good-enough versus their set counterparts, ie a mid-range gfx card and a low-end cpu playing a new dx11 game on a cheap 1920x1200(1080) monitor versus it&#039;s dx9 brethern at 720p on XBOX360/PS3.  End of 2011 into 2012 should bring some awesome things as well as companies create products that will eventually be transitioned to 22nm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with some of that. <img src='http://en.expreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think AMD will price-match 480/470 with 5890/5870.  The 5850 will sit in some weird limbo because as the best value it can; until G104 is released.  Then the two will spar.  That would be AMD drinking nVIDIA&#8217;s milkshake, as it were.  Come 28nm though at the end of this year or beginning of the next, both will likely be equals again; competitive in each segment. </p>
<p>As for CPUs, I actually have faith in AMDs plans.  I think the setup, which is Llano (Fusion) versus dual-core Sandy Bridge and Zambezi (&#8217;4/8-core&#8217; Bulldozer) above and below quad-core SB, will certainly spur Intel to get Haswell together on the GPU front.  It&#8217;s too late for Ivy Bridge as we already know that will be essentially a quad-core Intel CPU against a Bulldozer with 2nd-gen Fusion for the mid-range and 6-8 (or what AMD would call 12-16) at the higher-end.  Did I mention a half-Llano &#8216;Bobcat&#8217; for laptops on 28nm in 2011?  Yes, there will be competition in CPUs.</p>
<p>Concerning SSDs, there&#8217;s not a lot to be happy about at the moment, for which I agree, but the ~$100 boot drives (32/40GB) are a good start.  Given the upcoming NAND shrinks from not only Intel, but the other suppliers, not-to-mention the new controllers like Sandforce, I think a year from now there will be not only good value on the low-end, but in-turn speed improvement and price-wars on the higher-end; bringing the tech as a whole one step closer to the mainstream.  I Don&#8217;t expect true acceptance until the next-gen after that, but still, improvement and competition which is the point.  </p>
<p>In short:  Yes, 2010 kind of sucks from a consumer value and competition standpoint.  But 2011 will bring good value and innovation as companies dabble in 32nm and smaller (28/25nm) process tech and products become good-enough versus their set counterparts, ie a mid-range gfx card and a low-end cpu playing a new dx11 game on a cheap 1920&#215;1200(1080) monitor versus it&#8217;s dx9 brethern at 720p on XBOX360/PS3.  End of 2011 into 2012 should bring some awesome things as well as companies create products that will eventually be transitioned to 22nm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMD Phenom II X6 Clocks Leaked by EliteBastard</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/18/amd-phenom-ii-x6-clocks-leaked/6885.html/comment-page-1#comment-10504</link>
		<dc:creator>EliteBastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6885#comment-10504</guid>
		<description>3.6 GHz damn good AMD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3.6 GHz damn good AMD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMD Phenom II X6 Clocks Leaked by Expertview</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/18/amd-phenom-ii-x6-clocks-leaked/6885.html/comment-page-1#comment-10501</link>
		<dc:creator>Expertview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6885#comment-10501</guid>
		<description>dynamic speed boost
1075T = 3,6GHz
1055T = 3,2GHz
1035T = 2,9GHz
960T = 3,4GHz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dynamic speed boost<br />
1075T = 3,6GHz<br />
1055T = 3,2GHz<br />
1035T = 2,9GHz<br />
960T = 3,4GHz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ATI Catalyst 10.3 Preview Drivers Released by EliteBastard</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/18/ati-catalyst-10-3-preview-drivers-released/6887.html/comment-page-1#comment-10500</link>
		<dc:creator>EliteBastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6887#comment-10500</guid>
		<description>I just love the healthy competition between ATI and Nvidia, because the consumer keeps winning. Example: the ATI 5850 came out at 249 and since Nvidia had no competing board actually went up in price to 299. When Fermi finally is released then the 5850 will drop in price to 229- or 199-. On the obverse Intel does not have another company &quot;hot on their tails&quot; and that is why they have the luxury in their words of doing what they want. It would befefit us all if AMD was a closer competitor. It would lower Intels prices and they would release newer CPUs faster. Why release something faster when you are already the fastest. You don&#039;t have to. Intel is artificially setting the read and write speeds on their ssds. By artificially I mean &quot;anywhere they want&quot; because all they have to do is stay just ahead of the competition. I am not complaining, I love their ssds, but to know my write speeds are set and could be increased just by a simple flash bios upgrade? Again that will happen when and if Intel wants it too. Intel could release the Gen 3 drives today but they just don&#039;t have to. This is just the current state of this market, not complaining, well maybe a little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love the healthy competition between ATI and Nvidia, because the consumer keeps winning. Example: the ATI 5850 came out at 249 and since Nvidia had no competing board actually went up in price to 299. When Fermi finally is released then the 5850 will drop in price to 229- or 199-. On the obverse Intel does not have another company &#8220;hot on their tails&#8221; and that is why they have the luxury in their words of doing what they want. It would befefit us all if AMD was a closer competitor. It would lower Intels prices and they would release newer CPUs faster. Why release something faster when you are already the fastest. You don&#8217;t have to. Intel is artificially setting the read and write speeds on their ssds. By artificially I mean &#8220;anywhere they want&#8221; because all they have to do is stay just ahead of the competition. I am not complaining, I love their ssds, but to know my write speeds are set and could be increased just by a simple flash bios upgrade? Again that will happen when and if Intel wants it too. Intel could release the Gen 3 drives today but they just don&#8217;t have to. This is just the current state of this market, not complaining, well maybe a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Larrabee Project to Come Back With Vengeance in Its Own Time by ValiumMm</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2010/03/17/larrabee-project-to-come-back-with-vengeance-in-its-own-time/6876.html/comment-page-1#comment-10499</link>
		<dc:creator>ValiumMm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=6876#comment-10499</guid>
		<description>“Intel has the luxury of being able to release stuff in its own time, there are not too many other companies that can do that.”


your an idiot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Intel has the luxury of being able to release stuff in its own time, there are not too many other companies that can do that.”</p>
<p>your an idiot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->