<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report!</title>
	<link>http://en.expreview.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Intel&#8217;s first Nehalem mobo is X58 by Intel X58 Yongaseti Nehalemâ€™e Yol Veriyor &#187; FÄ°STÄ°K LÄ°FE</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/09/intels-first-nehalem-mobo-is-x58/#comment-3305</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel X58 Yongaseti Nehalemâ€™e Yol Veriyor &#187; FÄ°STÄ°K LÄ°FE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/09/intels-first-nehalem-mobo-is-x58/#comment-3305</guid>
		<description>[...] Intelâ€™s first Nehalem mobo is X58 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Intelâ€™s first Nehalem mobo is X58 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS&#8230; by Gigabyte: asus lying about EPU - TechEnclave</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3299</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigabyte: asus lying about EPU - TechEnclave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3299</guid>
		<description>[...] without change its hardware, but its EPU control software is actually only “down clock”.        Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS&#8230; - Expreview.com  Gigabyte: Asus Lied &#38; Fooled Customers - Tom's [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] without change its hardware, but its EPU control software is actually only “down clock”.        Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS&#8230; - Expreview.com  Gigabyte: Asus Lied &amp; Fooled Customers - Tom&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS&#8230; by fanÃ¡ticos por tecnologia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; [Tecnologia] Asus EPU vs Gigabyte DES - Round 1</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3297</link>
		<dc:creator>fanÃ¡ticos por tecnologia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; [Tecnologia] Asus EPU vs Gigabyte DES - Round 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 02:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3297</guid>
		<description>[...] A guerra pelo visto estÃ¡ sÃ³ comeÃ§ando e a Gigabyte nÃ£o estÃ¡ gostando de ver a posiÃ§Ã£o tomada pela Asus frente Ã  comunidade&#8230; e nem quando a Asus comeÃ§a a copiar algumas idÃ©ias da Gigabyte em termos de placa mÃ£e. Mais detalhes aqui. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A guerra pelo visto estÃ¡ sÃ³ comeÃ§ando e a Gigabyte nÃ£o estÃ¡ gostando de ver a posiÃ§Ã£o tomada pela Asus frente Ã  comunidade&#8230; e nem quando a Asus comeÃ§a a copiar algumas idÃ©ias da Gigabyte em termos de placa mÃ£e. Mais detalhes aqui. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS&#8230; by Asus plays ugly</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3296</link>
		<dc:creator>Asus plays ugly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3296</guid>
		<description>Wouldn't have thought that Asus feels the need for such foul tricks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t have thought that Asus feels the need for such foul tricks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intel: upgrade GPU have no benefit to users by Dumb and dumber</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/12/intel-upgrade-gpu-have-no-benefit-to-users/#comment-3295</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumb and dumber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/12/intel-upgrade-gpu-have-no-benefit-to-users/#comment-3295</guid>
		<description>Suuure, onboard graphics is the premier choice for 3D rendering in Autocad etc...

Looks like there are only complete and utter morons working at Intel XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suuure, onboard graphics is the premier choice for 3D rendering in Autocad etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Looks like there are only complete and utter morons working at Intel XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intel: upgrade GPU have no benefit to users by Jack</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/12/intel-upgrade-gpu-have-no-benefit-to-users/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/12/intel-upgrade-gpu-have-no-benefit-to-users/#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>That's funny. Intel and Nvidia are supposed to be partners in PCGA, yet they are provoking each other. But Intel is really missing the point of buying GPU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny. Intel and Nvidia are supposed to be partners in PCGA, yet they are provoking each other. But Intel is really missing the point of buying GPU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intel: upgrade GPU have no benefit to users by Sosel</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/12/intel-upgrade-gpu-have-no-benefit-to-users/#comment-3288</link>
		<dc:creator>Sosel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/12/intel-upgrade-gpu-have-no-benefit-to-users/#comment-3288</guid>
		<description>Nice revenge from Intel on Nvidia...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice revenge from Intel on Nvidia&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS&#8230; by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 06:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3285</guid>
		<description>They were in talks several months ago of cooperating with each other. However the talks fell apart because both respective companies believed it was for the good of the market and themselves to still remain as separate entities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were in talks several months ago of cooperating with each other. However the talks fell apart because both respective companies believed it was for the good of the market and themselves to still remain as separate entities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intel&#8217;s first Nehalem mobo is X58 by Intelâ€™s Next-Generation Enthusiast Platform Begins to Take Shape. &#124; Eggie's Hardware Blog</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/09/intels-first-nehalem-mobo-is-x58/#comment-3284</link>
		<dc:creator>Intelâ€™s Next-Generation Enthusiast Platform Begins to Take Shape. &#124; Eggie's Hardware Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 06:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/09/intels-first-nehalem-mobo-is-x58/#comment-3284</guid>
		<description>[...] Expreview [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Expreview [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS&#8230; by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 05:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3283</guid>
		<description>gigabyte merged with asus years ago, then they split off</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gigabyte merged with asus years ago, then they split off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS&#8230; by Tim</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 03:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>I thought Gigabyte and Asus joined the two companies together?  How can they be at war with a company they merged or joined?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Gigabyte and Asus joined the two companies together?  How can they be at war with a company they merged or joined?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS&#8230; by miley</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>miley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>go gigabyte go!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go gigabyte go!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Look! ASUS next-gen mainstream mobo P5Q-E by philip</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/06/first-look-asus-next-gen-mainstream-mobo-p5q-e/#comment-3280</link>
		<dc:creator>philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/03/06/first-look-asus-next-gen-mainstream-mobo-p5q-e/#comment-3280</guid>
		<description>because it is value board, so heatpipe is expensive module</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because it is value board, so heatpipe is expensive module</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS&#8230; by [EP] Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS… - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3279</link>
		<dc:creator>[EP] Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS… - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/13/gigabyte-now-going-on-war-with-asus/#comment-3279</guid>
		<description>[...] Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS…     Source   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Gigabyte now going to war with ASUS…     Source   [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intel&#8217;s first Nehalem mobo is X58 by Intel X58 Chipset Details Leaked &#124; Computer and Technoloy News</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/09/intels-first-nehalem-mobo-is-x58/#comment-3278</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel X58 Chipset Details Leaked &#124; Computer and Technoloy News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/09/intels-first-nehalem-mobo-is-x58/#comment-3278</guid>
		<description>[...] Expreview, OCWORKBENCH No Tags addthis_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Expreview, OCWORKBENCH No Tags addthis_url = [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
