<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Expreview.com - Extra Hardware News Report!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.expreview.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.expreview.com</link>
	<description>Focus on PC hardware news, especially graphic card news and reviews.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Core i7 overclocked to 4.2GHz easily</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/11/core-i7-overclocked-to-42ghz-easily.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/11/core-i7-overclocked-to-42ghz-easily.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bloomfield]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Core i7-965]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=1070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Because Core i7 Extreme has multiplier unlocked, so overclockers can easily OC to 4.2GHz by pulling up the multiplier. But like Phenom, the bus speed can not boost a lot. So we&#8217;d better drop our thought, they are not Core 2 anymore, so we may not have chance to see 500MHz+ bus speed.
If you read [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/11/core-i7-overclocked-to-42ghz-easily.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forceware 178.13 fixed GT200 HybridPower hibernation</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/10/forceware-17813-fixed-gt200-hybridpower-hibernation.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/10/forceware-17813-fixed-gt200-hybridpower-hibernation.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Motherboard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[178.13]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GTX 260]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=1064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

There won&#8217;t be a lot of people out there using Hybrid SLI mobo and a GTX  260/280. But here is the heads up, the Driver 178.13 has changed，or fixed GT200 series Hybrid Power hibernation.
In release notes NVIDIA states they &#8220;has determined that a minimal fan RPM is needed to deliver the most reliable experience [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/10/forceware-17813-fixed-gt200-hybridpower-hibernation.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nehalem will be launched on November 17th</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/10/nehalem-will-be-launch-on-november-17th.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/10/nehalem-will-be-launch-on-november-17th.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Qing</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=1056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Intel&#8217;s Nehalem will be launched on November 17th, ensuring that three products will be released, Bloomfield(XE) will be named as Core i7-965XE, Bloomfield(P1) named as Core i7-940 and the Bloomfield(MS3) named as Core i7-920.
The Core i7-965XE at 3.2GHz, it will be sold at $999;Core i7-940 at 2.93GHz, sold at $562;Core i7-920 at 2.66GHz, sold at $284.
Yet, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/10/nehalem-will-be-launch-on-november-17th.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;New&#8221; GeForce9600GSO aka 48SP 9600GT</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/08/1049.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/08/1049.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[9600GSO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[G92]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[G94]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[shrink]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=1049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

AMD announced Radeon HD4600 series, and one single 9500GT can not secure the entry  market for itself. NVIDIA hurried to roll out it&#8217;s &#8220;New&#8221; 9600GSO to make sense.
New version of GeForce9600GSO is based on G94 core, and the amount of shader reduces to 48 (9600GT has 64SP), but memory interface keeps at 256bit, memory size [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/08/1049.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DFI LANPARTY UT X58 will be on sale next month</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/08/dfi-lanparty-ut-x58-will-be-on-sale-next-month.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/08/dfi-lanparty-ut-x58-will-be-on-sale-next-month.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Qing</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Motherboard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DFI]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[LanParty]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[X58]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


The X58 mobo becomes a hot topic recently. DFI releases it&#8217;s X58 as well, so let&#8217;s take a look at DFI&#8217;s LANPARTY UT X58 mobo.
This mobo is a sample, so its cooler is not completed yet. But DFI will give more interest for the DIYers , it will set up a similar made by Thermalright [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/08/dfi-lanparty-ut-x58-will-be-on-sale-next-month.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9800GT/GTX,9500GT to lower power consumption by BIOS update</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/08/9800gtgtx9500gt-to-lower-power-consumption-by-bios-update.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/08/9800gtgtx9500gt-to-lower-power-consumption-by-bios-update.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[9500GT]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[9800GT]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[9800GTX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

NVIDIA has been trying to make them greener. According to some partners of the company, there is BIOS update incoming for several GeForce 9 series graphic cards. With the BIOS updated, 9800GT, 9800GTX and 9500GT will have a lower power consumption when idle.
If you have tried 9500GT, you may notice the card has a  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/08/9800gtgtx9500gt-to-lower-power-consumption-by-bios-update.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take a look at Biostar&#8217;s T-Power X58 MOBO</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/08/take-a-look-at-biostars-t-power-x58-mobo.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/08/take-a-look-at-biostars-t-power-x58-mobo.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Qing</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Motherboard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Biostar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[X58]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=1028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

With the date which Intel releases Nehalem comes close , X58 motherboards becomes a hot topic in. Today we take a look at X58 motherboard of Biostar&#8217;s T-Power X58 , yet there are one more choice for the fans of Core i7.
The Biostar&#8217;s T-Power X58 has 12-phase power supply, and it also features a heat [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/08/take-a-look-at-biostars-t-power-x58-mobo.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASUS showed off P6T6 WS Revolution with 6 PCIe X16 slot</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/07/asus-showed-off-p6t6-ws-revolution-with-6-pcie-x16-slot.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/07/asus-showed-off-p6t6-ws-revolution-with-6-pcie-x16-slot.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Motherboard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Asus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[P6T]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[X58]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=1022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
P6T6 WS Revolution,six PCIe!

ASUS held a small conference in Taipei yesterday. During the conference ASUS showed off some work station and ROG model X58 mobo.
The P6T WS PRO is featured with two PCIe X16, two PCI-X and on board SAS(Serial  Attached SCSI) HD support. P6T6 WS Revolution doesn&#8217;t have any PCI or PCIe  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/07/asus-showed-off-p6t6-ws-revolution-with-6-pcie-x16-slot.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mainstream Nehalem: Lynnfield comparison photo revealed</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/07/mainstream-nehalem-lynnfield-comparison-photo-revealed.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/07/mainstream-nehalem-lynnfield-comparison-photo-revealed.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Core i7]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lynnfield]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=1018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

JC at Xfastest posted some comparison photos of the yet-to-come mainstream  Nehalem CPU, the Lynnfield and sever model Gainestown.
Lynnfield is scheduled to launch in Q4 2009. This version of Nehalem uses Socket LGA1160. Rather than the high end QPI link, Lynnfield sticks on DMI link, and only supports dual channel DDR3 memory.
(DMI, Direct Media [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/07/mainstream-nehalem-lynnfield-comparison-photo-revealed.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Core i7-965: 50% more performance than QX9770</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/06/intel-core-i7-965-50-more-performance-than-qx9770.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/06/intel-core-i7-965-50-more-performance-than-qx9770.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 07:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[965]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Core i7]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[QX9770]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

According to some reviewers who had their hands on the upcoming  Bloomfield, the new CPU runs great. But how huge improvement it is compared to today&#8217;s top dog?
In a recent document sent to partners, Intel pointed out that when comparing Core i7-965 with QX9770, we can get 52% more 3D gaming performance, 38% more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/06/intel-core-i7-965-50-more-performance-than-qx9770.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9600GSO &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to 55nm G94 core</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/06/nvidia-product-update-55nm-g94-9600gso-coming.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/06/nvidia-product-update-55nm-g94-9600gso-coming.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 06:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[9600GSO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[G94]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Some changes will be make in NVIDIA&#8217;s product line. This time NVIDIA keeps the name but change the core inside. Our sources mentioned the  original G92 9600GSO will be discontinued, and NVIDIA is rolling out a new  9600GSO with G94 chip and keeping the name unchanged. The new 9600GSO will have 512MB memory，we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/10/06/nvidia-product-update-55nm-g94-9600gso-coming.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zotac has announced a non-reference 9800GTX+ with AC Twin Turbo</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/27/zotac-has-announced-a-non-reference-9800gtx-with-ac-twin-turbo.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/27/zotac-has-announced-a-non-reference-9800gtx-with-ac-twin-turbo.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Qing</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[9800GTX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Zotac has announced a non-reference 9800GTX+,the card is cooled by the AC Twin Turbo.
As for this non-reference graphics card,the design is different from another.It still maintained the core of four-phase power supply and the PCB length with the reference.It&#8217;s working at 740MHz for core,1836MHz for shaders and 2200Mhz with GDDR3 memory.
Zotac said that this card [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/27/zotac-has-announced-a-non-reference-9800gtx-with-ac-twin-turbo.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD OverDrive was update to 2.1.4 version</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/27/amd-overdrive-was-update-to-214-version.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/27/amd-overdrive-was-update-to-214-version.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Qing</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Overclocking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OverDrive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
AMD OverDrive was update to 2.1.4 version.

*Added multi-language support.
*Fixed bug on Max HT multiplier detection
*Fixed SB600 &#38; SB700 detection error under RAID mode.
*Fixed bug that some CPU core multiplier may fail to set when setting together with CPUVID/NBVID.
*Fixed bug that CPU multiplier is not set when AutoClock to hang the system and reboot.
Download
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/27/amd-overdrive-was-update-to-214-version.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two new non-reference GeForce 9800GTX+ hit shelf</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/25/two-new-non-reference-geforce-9800gtx-hit-shelf.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/25/two-new-non-reference-geforce-9800gtx-hit-shelf.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Qing</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[9800GTX]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dark Knight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The recent listing of GeForce 9800GTX+ which are non-reference PCB,included two products from Inno3D and ASUS&#8217; &#8220;Dark Knight&#8221;.
Their specifications are similar,both of them are working at 738MHz for core,1836MHz for shaders and 2200Mhz for 512MB of GDDR3 memory,keeps the reference clocks.The difference is that Inno3D using the ultra-three GPU cooler and ASUS is 4 heat [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/25/two-new-non-reference-geforce-9800gtx-hit-shelf.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD energy efficient processors going 45nm</title>
		<link>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/25/amd-energy-efficient-processors-going-45nm.html</link>
		<comments>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/25/amd-energy-efficient-processors-going-45nm.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Propus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.expreview.com/?p=973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Our sources noticed that AMD is going to release four 45nm energy efficient  processors in 09Q2, two of them are Phenom X4, and another two are Phenom X3.
AMD didn&#8217;t decide the product name of these processor yet, but they are going  to use the new naming scheme, so the four new power saving [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.expreview.com/2008/09/25/amd-energy-efficient-processors-going-45nm.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.088 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
